Ladies' Choice: Intersectional Linked Fate and Public Opinion Toward Women of Color in Politics.

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/poq/nfaf019
Joyce H Nguy, Alexandria J Davis, Nathan K Chan
{"title":"Ladies' Choice: Intersectional Linked Fate and Public Opinion Toward Women of Color in Politics.","authors":"Joyce H Nguy, Alexandria J Davis, Nathan K Chan","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article seeks to understand the public opinion formation among women of color in America. How do identity-based factors, such as linked fate with women of color (WoC), shape political evaluations? Expanding on social identity theory and intersectionality frameworks, we investigate the political influences of WoC identification and WoC intersectional linked fate. We argue that intersectional linked fate represents a deeper sense of shared experiences and interconnected outcomes across race and gender, making this both a conceptually distinct construct and a politically consequential extension of WoC identity. Further, we theorize that women of color's perceptions of intersectional linked fate drive their cross-racial support for real-world WoC in politics. We analyze data from the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey to test how intersectional linked fate correlates with evaluations of prominent WoC political figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, and Michelle Obama among Black, Latina, and Asian American women. Our findings reveal that intersectional linked fate has a stronger and more consistent influence on these political evaluations than either WoC identity or racial linked fate, fostering solidarity and support for WoC politicians across racial boundaries. The results highlight the critical role of intersectional linked fate in shaping public opinion with important implications for understanding future elections, especially as candidates, politics, and the electorate continue to diversify in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"89 2","pages":"361-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Opinion Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to understand the public opinion formation among women of color in America. How do identity-based factors, such as linked fate with women of color (WoC), shape political evaluations? Expanding on social identity theory and intersectionality frameworks, we investigate the political influences of WoC identification and WoC intersectional linked fate. We argue that intersectional linked fate represents a deeper sense of shared experiences and interconnected outcomes across race and gender, making this both a conceptually distinct construct and a politically consequential extension of WoC identity. Further, we theorize that women of color's perceptions of intersectional linked fate drive their cross-racial support for real-world WoC in politics. We analyze data from the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey to test how intersectional linked fate correlates with evaluations of prominent WoC political figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, and Michelle Obama among Black, Latina, and Asian American women. Our findings reveal that intersectional linked fate has a stronger and more consistent influence on these political evaluations than either WoC identity or racial linked fate, fostering solidarity and support for WoC politicians across racial boundaries. The results highlight the critical role of intersectional linked fate in shaping public opinion with important implications for understanding future elections, especially as candidates, politics, and the electorate continue to diversify in the United States.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

《女性的选择:政治中有色人种女性的交织命运与公众舆论》。
本文试图了解美国有色人种女性的舆论形成。基于身份的因素,如与有色人种女性(WoC)的命运联系在一起,是如何影响政治评价的?在社会认同理论和交叉性框架的基础上,我们研究了WoC认同和WoC交叉关联命运的政治影响。我们认为,交叉关联的命运代表了跨种族和性别的更深层的共同经历和相互关联的结果,使其既是概念上独特的结构,也是WoC身份的政治后果延伸。此外,我们推测,有色人种女性对交织命运的感知推动了她们在政治中对现实世界WoC的跨种族支持。我们分析了2020年多种族选举后合作调查的数据,以测试交叉关联命运与黑人、拉丁裔和亚裔美国女性对亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯、阿雅娜·普莱斯利和米歇尔·奥巴马等杰出WoC政治人物的评价之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,与WoC身份或种族联系命运相比,交叉联系命运对这些政治评价具有更强、更一致的影响,促进了WoC政治家跨越种族界限的团结和支持。研究结果强调了交叉关联命运在塑造公众舆论方面的关键作用,这对理解未来的选举具有重要意义,特别是在美国候选人、政治和选民继续多样化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Published since 1937, Public Opinion Quarterly is among the most frequently cited journals of its kind. Such interdisciplinary leadership benefits academicians and all social science researchers by providing a trusted source for a wide range of high quality research. POQ selectively publishes important theoretical contributions to opinion and communication research, analyses of current public opinion, and investigations of methodological issues involved in survey validity—including questionnaire construction, interviewing and interviewers, sampling strategy, and mode of administration. The theoretical and methodological advances detailed in pages of POQ ensure its importance as a research resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信