Evaluation of a dressing film for ultrasound-guided vascular puncture to achieve high-quality imaging and infection prevention.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mari Abe, Toshiaki Takahashi, Miyako Muta, Atsuo Kawamoto, Ryoko Murayama, Gojiro Nakagami
{"title":"Evaluation of a dressing film for ultrasound-guided vascular puncture to achieve high-quality imaging and infection prevention.","authors":"Mari Abe, Toshiaki Takahashi, Miyako Muta, Atsuo Kawamoto, Ryoko Murayama, Gojiro Nakagami","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01067-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the quality of ultrasound images obtained during peripheral vascular catheter insertion using a transparent film designed to maintain puncture site sterility during ultrasound-guided puncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images were collected from 10 healthy adult participants with and without film, focusing on the radial artery, forearm cephalic vein, and median cubital vein. In total, 300 ultrasound still images were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image quality was significantly lower at all sites with the film (mean total image quality: radial artery, 5.2 vs. 6.0: p = 0.019; forearm cephalic vein, 6.1 vs. 7.6: p < 0.001; median cubital vein, 6.0 vs. 7.4: p < 0.001). However, the clinical nurse's evaluation of puncture feasibility showed no significant difference for the radial artery (80.0% vs 96.7%) and forearm cephalic vein (100.0% vs 100.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compromised image quality using the film does not negatively affect the puncturability of the radial artery and forearm veins. This finding underscores the potential for maintaining sterile conditions during procedures without compromising the ability to successfully perform puncture, thereby improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01067-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the quality of ultrasound images obtained during peripheral vascular catheter insertion using a transparent film designed to maintain puncture site sterility during ultrasound-guided puncture.

Methods: Images were collected from 10 healthy adult participants with and without film, focusing on the radial artery, forearm cephalic vein, and median cubital vein. In total, 300 ultrasound still images were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale.

Results: Image quality was significantly lower at all sites with the film (mean total image quality: radial artery, 5.2 vs. 6.0: p = 0.019; forearm cephalic vein, 6.1 vs. 7.6: p < 0.001; median cubital vein, 6.0 vs. 7.4: p < 0.001). However, the clinical nurse's evaluation of puncture feasibility showed no significant difference for the radial artery (80.0% vs 96.7%) and forearm cephalic vein (100.0% vs 100.0%).

Conclusion: Compromised image quality using the film does not negatively affect the puncturability of the radial artery and forearm veins. This finding underscores the potential for maintaining sterile conditions during procedures without compromising the ability to successfully perform puncture, thereby improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.

超声引导血管穿刺敷料膜的评价,以获得高质量的成像和预防感染。
目的:本研究在超声引导下,采用透明膜保持穿刺部位无菌,评估外周血管导管插入过程中超声图像的质量。方法:收集10例健康成人有膜和无膜图像,重点观察桡动脉、前臂头静脉和肘正中静脉。总共300张超声静止图像使用10分李克特量表进行评估。结果:使用该膜后,所有部位的图像质量均明显降低(平均总图像质量:桡动脉,5.2 vs. 6.0: p = 0.019;前臂头静脉,6.1 vs. 7.6: p)。结论:使用该膜后,图像质量受损不会对桡动脉和前臂静脉的穿刺性产生负面影响。这一发现强调了在手术过程中保持无菌条件而不影响成功进行穿刺的能力的潜力,从而改善了患者的预后和手术效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信