Matan Elkan, Liat Nachshon, Ortal Cohen, Michael B Levy, Yael Koren, Naama Epstein-Rigby, Arnon Elizur, Michael R Goldberg
{"title":"Effects of Oral Immunotherapy on the Growth Trajectories of Food-Allergic Children.","authors":"Matan Elkan, Liat Nachshon, Ortal Cohen, Michael B Levy, Yael Koren, Naama Epstein-Rigby, Arnon Elizur, Michael R Goldberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with IgE-mediated food allergies, particularly milk, are at risk for hampered growth. Limited data are available regarding the benefit of oral immunotherapy (OIT) on growth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of OIT on growth metrics in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients (aged 4-15 [females] and 4-16.5 [males] years) who successfully completed OIT. Pre- and post-OIT height-for-age and weight-for-age z-scores (HAZ and WAZ, respectively) were calculated using World Health Organization standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (n = 458, mean age 8.0 ± 2.7 years) successfully treated for tree nut (33.4%), peanut (29.7%), milk (17.2%), sesame (14.6%), and egg (4.8%) allergy were analyzed. Baseline mean HAZ -0.19 ± 1.05 improved to -0.10 ± 1.05 (P < .001) after OIT (median duration, 19.4 months). This was positively correlated with the mean change in WAZ (r = 0.44, P < .001). Milk-allergic patients had lower baseline HAZ than non-milk-allergic patients (-0.45 ± 0.91 vs -0.14 ± 1.07, P = .016). Patients beginning OIT before age 6 had the greatest HAZ improvement (0.16 ± 0.42), whereas those starting after age 12 experienced a decrease (-0.11 ± 0.49). In 113 patients with a median 34-month follow-up, HAZ improved by 0.30 ± 0.73 (P < .001). This effect was not observed at long-term follow-up in a group of patients who did not achieve successful OIT (n = 21). Using a linear regression model, significant predictors of follow-up HAZ were younger age at baseline (B = -0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.15, -0.03], P = .002) and lower baseline HAZ (B = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.97], P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OIT may enhance long-term growth in allergic children, especially in younger patients and those with a lower baseline HAZ. Effects on their final stature remain to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.08.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Children with IgE-mediated food allergies, particularly milk, are at risk for hampered growth. Limited data are available regarding the benefit of oral immunotherapy (OIT) on growth outcomes.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of OIT on growth metrics in this population.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients (aged 4-15 [females] and 4-16.5 [males] years) who successfully completed OIT. Pre- and post-OIT height-for-age and weight-for-age z-scores (HAZ and WAZ, respectively) were calculated using World Health Organization standards.
Results: Patients (n = 458, mean age 8.0 ± 2.7 years) successfully treated for tree nut (33.4%), peanut (29.7%), milk (17.2%), sesame (14.6%), and egg (4.8%) allergy were analyzed. Baseline mean HAZ -0.19 ± 1.05 improved to -0.10 ± 1.05 (P < .001) after OIT (median duration, 19.4 months). This was positively correlated with the mean change in WAZ (r = 0.44, P < .001). Milk-allergic patients had lower baseline HAZ than non-milk-allergic patients (-0.45 ± 0.91 vs -0.14 ± 1.07, P = .016). Patients beginning OIT before age 6 had the greatest HAZ improvement (0.16 ± 0.42), whereas those starting after age 12 experienced a decrease (-0.11 ± 0.49). In 113 patients with a median 34-month follow-up, HAZ improved by 0.30 ± 0.73 (P < .001). This effect was not observed at long-term follow-up in a group of patients who did not achieve successful OIT (n = 21). Using a linear regression model, significant predictors of follow-up HAZ were younger age at baseline (B = -0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.15, -0.03], P = .002) and lower baseline HAZ (B = 0.83, 95% CI [0.69, 0.97], P < .001).
Conclusions: OIT may enhance long-term growth in allergic children, especially in younger patients and those with a lower baseline HAZ. Effects on their final stature remain to be determined.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.