Comparison of four diagnostic techniques for Cryptosporidium detection in Qatar.

Q3 Medicine
Qatar Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5339/qmj.2025.78
Sallama Sabooni, Husam Salah, Rajvir Singh, Khloud Al-Qadi, Saad J Taj-Aldeen, Emad Ibrahim
{"title":"Comparison of four diagnostic techniques for <i>Cryptosporidium</i> detection in Qatar.","authors":"Sallama Sabooni, Husam Salah, Rajvir Singh, Khloud Al-Qadi, Saad J Taj-Aldeen, Emad Ibrahim","doi":"10.5339/qmj.2025.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Cryptosporidium</i> is a common pathogenic parasite known to cause diarrhea in humans and animals, particularly in young children living in poor conditions. Although diarrheal disease is usually mild in immunocompetent individuals, it may progress into a life-threatening complication among the immunocompromised. Due to insensitive conventional diagnostic methods, the identification of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> can be inaccurate and challenging. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis infection in Qatar by comparing four different diagnostic methods for detecting <i>Cryptosporidium</i> in human stool samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to December 2019, stool samples from patients with various gastrointestinal symptoms were collected at the microbiology laboratory at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar for parasitic detection. The stool samples were tested using four diagnostic methods: routine microscopy, immunochromatography (ICT), multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and modified Kinyoun's acid-fast stain (MKS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of the four different detection methods, 36 (18%) out of 205 stool samples tested positive for <i>Cryptosporidium</i>, with detection rates of 18%, 15%, 7%, and 6% using PCR, ICT, MKS, and routine microscopy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The superior sensitivity of PCR and ICT supports their integration into routine diagnostics to improve the detection and public health surveillance of cryptosporidiosis in Qatar.</p>","PeriodicalId":53667,"journal":{"name":"Qatar Medical Journal","volume":"2025 3","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qatar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cryptosporidium is a common pathogenic parasite known to cause diarrhea in humans and animals, particularly in young children living in poor conditions. Although diarrheal disease is usually mild in immunocompetent individuals, it may progress into a life-threatening complication among the immunocompromised. Due to insensitive conventional diagnostic methods, the identification of Cryptosporidium can be inaccurate and challenging. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of cryptosporidiosis infection in Qatar by comparing four different diagnostic methods for detecting Cryptosporidium in human stool samples.

Methods: From January 2018 to December 2019, stool samples from patients with various gastrointestinal symptoms were collected at the microbiology laboratory at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar for parasitic detection. The stool samples were tested using four diagnostic methods: routine microscopy, immunochromatography (ICT), multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and modified Kinyoun's acid-fast stain (MKS).

Results: In the evaluation of the four different detection methods, 36 (18%) out of 205 stool samples tested positive for Cryptosporidium, with detection rates of 18%, 15%, 7%, and 6% using PCR, ICT, MKS, and routine microscopy, respectively.

Conclusion: The superior sensitivity of PCR and ICT supports their integration into routine diagnostics to improve the detection and public health surveillance of cryptosporidiosis in Qatar.

Abstract Image

卡塔尔隐孢子虫四种诊断技术的比较。
背景:隐孢子虫是一种常见的致病性寄生虫,已知可引起人类和动物腹泻,特别是生活条件恶劣的幼儿。虽然腹泻病在免疫正常的个体中通常是轻微的,但在免疫功能低下的个体中可能会发展成危及生命的并发症。由于传统的诊断方法不敏感,隐孢子虫的鉴定可能是不准确和具有挑战性的。本研究旨在通过比较四种不同的检测人类粪便样本隐孢子虫的诊断方法,调查卡塔尔隐孢子虫病感染的流行情况。方法:2018年1月至2019年12月,在卡塔尔哈马德总医院微生物实验室采集各种胃肠道症状患者的粪便标本,进行寄生虫检测。采用常规镜检、免疫层析(ICT)、多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)和改良的金氏抗酸染色(MKS)四种诊断方法对粪便标本进行检测。结果:在4种不同检测方法的评价中,205份粪便标本中隐孢子虫阳性36例(18%),PCR、ICT、MKS和常规镜检检出率分别为18%、15%、7%和6%。结论:PCR和ICT具有较高的灵敏度,可用于卡塔尔隐孢子虫病的常规诊断,提高卡塔尔隐孢子虫病的检测和公共卫生监测水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qatar Medical Journal
Qatar Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信