A Pilot Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial of School-Supervised Therapy to Improve Pediatric Asthma Control.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Michelle Trivedi, Michelle Spano, Christine Frisard, Sybil Crawford, Grace Ryan, Melissa Goulding, Sonia Radu, Juliana Arenas, Sarah Becker, Layana Al-Halbouni, Jordan Alter, Nancy Byatt, Wanda Phipatanakul, Milagros C Rosal, Stephenie C Lemon, Lynn B Gerald, Lori Pbert
{"title":"A Pilot Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial of School-Supervised Therapy to Improve Pediatric Asthma Control.","authors":"Michelle Trivedi, Michelle Spano, Christine Frisard, Sybil Crawford, Grace Ryan, Melissa Goulding, Sonia Radu, Juliana Arenas, Sarah Becker, Layana Al-Halbouni, Jordan Alter, Nancy Byatt, Wanda Phipatanakul, Milagros C Rosal, Stephenie C Lemon, Lynn B Gerald, Lori Pbert","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although school-supervised inhaled corticosteroid administration has potential to improve asthma morbidity, there has yet to be an evaluation of the pediatric practice as a setting to identify children with asthma and connect them to school-supervised asthma therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a pragmatic pilot trial of Asthma Link, a model that connects children with asthma seen in pediatric practice to supervised asthma therapy in the school setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four pediatric practices were pair-matched and randomized to (1) Asthma Link plus an asthma educational workbook or (2) Enhanced Usual Care, the same workbook alone. We recruited children 6 to 17 years old with poorly controlled asthma, prescribed a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Parent-child dyads completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>recruitment/retention of pediatric practices and parent-child dyads and intervention fidelity.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>asthma symptoms, medication adherence, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, oral steroid use, missed schooldays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four pediatric practices and 66 parent-child dyads were recruited (average child age 9 y, 44% female, 65% Hispanic, 23% Black, 62% low income). All (4 of 4) practices were retained throughout the study and retention of parent-child dyads was 95%, 91%, and 89% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. All (31 of 31) Asthma Link families brought their child's preventive inhaler into school; children received school health staff-supervised therapy on more than 95% of schooldays over 12 months. Children in the Asthma Link group had greater improvement in Asthma Control Test scores, longer time to first asthma exacerbation, less oral steroid use, and better medication adherence compared with the Enhanced Usual Care group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extending the reach of pediatric practices to facilitate the delivery of daily asthma prevention medication at school was feasible and improved pediatric asthma morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although school-supervised inhaled corticosteroid administration has potential to improve asthma morbidity, there has yet to be an evaluation of the pediatric practice as a setting to identify children with asthma and connect them to school-supervised asthma therapy.

Objective: Conduct a pragmatic pilot trial of Asthma Link, a model that connects children with asthma seen in pediatric practice to supervised asthma therapy in the school setting.

Methods: Four pediatric practices were pair-matched and randomized to (1) Asthma Link plus an asthma educational workbook or (2) Enhanced Usual Care, the same workbook alone. We recruited children 6 to 17 years old with poorly controlled asthma, prescribed a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Parent-child dyads completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.

Primary outcomes: recruitment/retention of pediatric practices and parent-child dyads and intervention fidelity.

Secondary outcomes: asthma symptoms, medication adherence, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, oral steroid use, missed schooldays.

Results: Four pediatric practices and 66 parent-child dyads were recruited (average child age 9 y, 44% female, 65% Hispanic, 23% Black, 62% low income). All (4 of 4) practices were retained throughout the study and retention of parent-child dyads was 95%, 91%, and 89% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. All (31 of 31) Asthma Link families brought their child's preventive inhaler into school; children received school health staff-supervised therapy on more than 95% of schooldays over 12 months. Children in the Asthma Link group had greater improvement in Asthma Control Test scores, longer time to first asthma exacerbation, less oral steroid use, and better medication adherence compared with the Enhanced Usual Care group.

Conclusions: Extending the reach of pediatric practices to facilitate the delivery of daily asthma prevention medication at school was feasible and improved pediatric asthma morbidity.

一项学校监督治疗改善儿童哮喘控制的试点实用群随机试验。
背景:虽然学校监督的吸入皮质类固醇给药有可能改善哮喘发病率,但尚未对儿科实践进行评估,以确定哮喘儿童并将其与学校监督的哮喘治疗联系起来。目的:开展一项实用的哮喘链接试点试验,该模型将儿科实践中看到的哮喘儿童与学校环境中的监督哮喘治疗联系起来。方法:对4个儿科诊所进行配对并随机分为(1)哮喘链接加哮喘教育练习册或(2)增强常规护理,单独使用相同的练习册。我们招募了6到17岁的哮喘控制不佳的儿童,每天吸入皮质类固醇。亲子二人组在基线、3,6和12个月时完成调查。主要结果:儿科实践的招募/保留,亲子关系和干预的保真度。次要结果:哮喘症状、药物依从性、急诊室就诊、住院、口服类固醇使用、缺课。结果:招募了4家儿科诊所和66对亲子对(平均儿童年龄9岁,44%为女性,65%为西班牙裔,23%为黑人,62%为低收入)。在整个研究过程中,所有(4个中的4个)实践都被保留了下来,在3个月、6个月和12个月时,父母-孩子二人组的保留率分别为95%、91%和89%。所有(31个中的31个)哮喘链接家庭都将孩子的预防性吸入器带入学校;儿童在12个月内95%以上的上学日接受学校保健人员监督的治疗。与强化常规护理组相比,哮喘链接组的儿童在哮喘控制测试分数上有更大的改善,第一次哮喘发作的时间更长,口服类固醇使用更少,药物依从性更好。结论:扩大儿科实践范围,促进学校日常哮喘预防药物的提供是可行的,并可改善儿童哮喘发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信