Effect of Fluorescence Biomodulation on Dermal Healing in an Equine Experimental In Vivo Wound Model.

IF 1.1 2区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Avery Loyd, Rachel Neto, Fred Caldwell, Lindsey Boone, Amelia White
{"title":"Effect of Fluorescence Biomodulation on Dermal Healing in an Equine Experimental In Vivo Wound Model.","authors":"Avery Loyd, Rachel Neto, Fred Caldwell, Lindsey Boone, Amelia White","doi":"10.1055/a-2655-9312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the safety and macroscopic/microscopic effects of fluorescence biomodulation (FBM) on experimentally induced, full-thickness, distal limb wounds in horses.This was an <i>in vivo</i> experimental study (<i>n</i> = 6 horses). Two full-thickness wounds were created on both dorsal metacarpi of six adult horses. Each forelimb was randomly allocated to either control (no FBM) or treatment (FBM) and randomly allocated to visual or histological assessment of healing. Wounds were treated within each experimental group every 7 days for four treatments. Fluorescence biomodulation wounds were treated twice per treatment period. Control wounds had no FBM treatment. Wounds were visually assessed for granulation tissue grading and photographed for wound surface area calculation, on days 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31. The skin from wound creation on day 0 was used for histology baseline. The wounds were then punch-biopsied on days 10, 17, 24 and 31. Data were analysed using linear mixed model analyses.Differences between control and treatment were not observed for any time point for wound surface area (<i>p</i> = 0.755), composite wound scores (<i>p</i> = 0.593), or histological assessment (<i>p</i> = 0.378). One horse produced exuberant granulation tissue in all wounds requiring debridement at study completion.Fluorescence biomodulation did not improve nor impair healing in an equine experimental <i>in vivo</i> distal limb wound model. Treatment effects may not have been observed due to small sample size, outcome variables measured or species differences. Further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-9312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the safety and macroscopic/microscopic effects of fluorescence biomodulation (FBM) on experimentally induced, full-thickness, distal limb wounds in horses.This was an in vivo experimental study (n = 6 horses). Two full-thickness wounds were created on both dorsal metacarpi of six adult horses. Each forelimb was randomly allocated to either control (no FBM) or treatment (FBM) and randomly allocated to visual or histological assessment of healing. Wounds were treated within each experimental group every 7 days for four treatments. Fluorescence biomodulation wounds were treated twice per treatment period. Control wounds had no FBM treatment. Wounds were visually assessed for granulation tissue grading and photographed for wound surface area calculation, on days 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31. The skin from wound creation on day 0 was used for histology baseline. The wounds were then punch-biopsied on days 10, 17, 24 and 31. Data were analysed using linear mixed model analyses.Differences between control and treatment were not observed for any time point for wound surface area (p = 0.755), composite wound scores (p = 0.593), or histological assessment (p = 0.378). One horse produced exuberant granulation tissue in all wounds requiring debridement at study completion.Fluorescence biomodulation did not improve nor impair healing in an equine experimental in vivo distal limb wound model. Treatment effects may not have been observed due to small sample size, outcome variables measured or species differences. Further studies are needed.

荧光生物调节对马实验性体内创面模型真皮愈合的影响。
本研究旨在确定荧光生物调节(FBM)对实验诱导的马远端肢体全层损伤的安全性和宏观/微观影响。这是一项体内实验研究(n = 6匹马)。在六匹成年马的双背掌骨上创造了两处全层伤口。每个前肢被随机分配到对照组(无FBM)或治疗组(FBM),并随机分配到视觉或组织学愈合评估组。各组创面每7 d处理一次,共4次。荧光生物调节创面在每个治疗期治疗2次。对照伤口未行FBM治疗。在第3、10、17、24和31天,对伤口进行肉芽组织分级和拍照以计算伤口表面积。创面第0天皮肤作为组织学基线。然后在第10、17、24和31天对伤口进行穿孔活检。数据分析采用线性混合模型分析。对照组和治疗组在创面面积(p = 0.755)、复合创面评分(p = 0.593)或组织学评估(p = 0.378)的任何时间点均无差异。在研究结束时,一匹马在所有需要清创的伤口上产生了丰富的肉芽组织。荧光生物调节既没有改善也没有损害马远端肢体创伤模型的愈合。由于样本量小、测量的结果变量或物种差异,可能没有观察到治疗效果。需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信