Victoria O'Connor, James R Bateman, Anna T Magnante, Katherine M Craig, Sarah L Martindale
{"title":"A pilot study evaluating early psychosocial risk and brain health outcomes in Veterans with mild TBI.","authors":"Victoria O'Connor, James R Bateman, Anna T Magnante, Katherine M Craig, Sarah L Martindale","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2549428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this pilot study was to describe the relationship between early psychosocial risk (i.e., adverse childhood experiences, neighborhood disadvantage, multiple relocations) and brain health outcomes among Veterans with mild TBI. Veterans (N = 76) with mild TBI participated at an outpatient VA. This cross-sectional study involved the collection and analysis of retrospective self-report data and neuropsychological tests. Interviews and surveys included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury, Childhood Experiences Survey, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Patient Health Questionnaire. Neuropsychological tests included the California Verbal Learning Test-3, Controlled Oral Word Association and Animal Naming, Stroop, Trail Making Test, and WAIS-IV subtests (Digit Span, Letter Number Sequencing). Global deficit scores were calculated. Participants endorsed a wide range of psychosocial risk factors. Cognitive functioning was generally intact. There were few significant relationships between early psychosocial risk and outcomes. Early psychosocial risk was not associated with mental health or cognitive functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2549428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The goal of this pilot study was to describe the relationship between early psychosocial risk (i.e., adverse childhood experiences, neighborhood disadvantage, multiple relocations) and brain health outcomes among Veterans with mild TBI. Veterans (N = 76) with mild TBI participated at an outpatient VA. This cross-sectional study involved the collection and analysis of retrospective self-report data and neuropsychological tests. Interviews and surveys included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury, Childhood Experiences Survey, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Patient Health Questionnaire. Neuropsychological tests included the California Verbal Learning Test-3, Controlled Oral Word Association and Animal Naming, Stroop, Trail Making Test, and WAIS-IV subtests (Digit Span, Letter Number Sequencing). Global deficit scores were calculated. Participants endorsed a wide range of psychosocial risk factors. Cognitive functioning was generally intact. There were few significant relationships between early psychosocial risk and outcomes. Early psychosocial risk was not associated with mental health or cognitive functioning.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.