Mitigating PFAS contamination in the United States: assessing the impact of California's legislation from 2018 to 2022 on drinking water quality.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sameer D Bagga, Iris J N Parshley, Lindsay Tallon
{"title":"Mitigating PFAS contamination in the United States: assessing the impact of California's legislation from 2018 to 2022 on drinking water quality.","authors":"Sameer D Bagga, Iris J N Parshley, Lindsay Tallon","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.

减轻美国PFAS污染:评估2018年至2022年加州立法对饮用水质量的影响。
本研究评估了加州特定全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)立法对公共饮用水中全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)污染水平的影响。我们使用美国环境保护署(US EPA)不受管制污染物监测规则(UCMRs),特别是UCMR 3和UCMR 5收集的数据进行了比较统计分析。为了评估立法前(2017年)和立法后(2023年)公共供水系统中PFOA和PFOS的水平,我们使用Levene检验来评估方差差异,然后使用unpaired t检验和Welch t检验来比较两个时间段之间的平均PFAS浓度。我们检测到立法后PFOA和PFOS水平显著下降,这表明强有力的州一级监管措施可以有效减少PFAS污染。研究结果突出表明,加州的综合办法有可能成为减少全氟辛烷磺酸暴露和保护公众健康的国家政策的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Policy
Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信