A review to determine regulatorily and reimbursement successes of studies conducted using data from Canadian patient support programs based on the real-world evidence guidelines published by Canadian drug agency and health Canada.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/jpps.2025.14587
Catherine Y Lau
{"title":"A review to determine regulatorily and reimbursement successes of studies conducted using data from Canadian patient support programs based on the real-world evidence guidelines published by Canadian drug agency and health Canada.","authors":"Catherine Y Lau","doi":"10.3389/jpps.2025.14587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Support Programs (PSPs) are growing globally to support early reimbursement, disease and medication dosing management. In Canada, the lack of public health support has promoted the rapid expansion of company-supported disease-specific or drug-product-specific PSPs. Data collected from these programs generate unique Canadian data serving as a valuable source of real-world data (RWD), generally adopted in EU and US as a source of evidence generation. This review evaluates the suitability of PSP data for regulatory or reimbursement submissions, based on recently published Real World Evidence guidelines by the Canadian Drug Agency (CDA-AMC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peer-reviewed publications evaluating patients with chronic diseases enrolled in a PSP from 1 January 2020, to 31 March 2025, were selected for review. The checklist in the CDA-AMC RWE Guideline was used to measure the quality and suitability of the PSP data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were reviewed against the checklist. Based on the criteria required to inform decision-making, most studies failed to meet key criteria for regulatory submissions. One recently published study, \"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab\" met most regulatory and reimbursement submission requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data quality validation, data source transparency, validated methodology to manage study bias, measured or unmeasured confounders, and robust outcome analysis, including sensitivity and quantitative bias analysis, are essential to ensure PSP data analysis results in successful decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"14587"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jpps.2025.14587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient Support Programs (PSPs) are growing globally to support early reimbursement, disease and medication dosing management. In Canada, the lack of public health support has promoted the rapid expansion of company-supported disease-specific or drug-product-specific PSPs. Data collected from these programs generate unique Canadian data serving as a valuable source of real-world data (RWD), generally adopted in EU and US as a source of evidence generation. This review evaluates the suitability of PSP data for regulatory or reimbursement submissions, based on recently published Real World Evidence guidelines by the Canadian Drug Agency (CDA-AMC).

Methods: Peer-reviewed publications evaluating patients with chronic diseases enrolled in a PSP from 1 January 2020, to 31 March 2025, were selected for review. The checklist in the CDA-AMC RWE Guideline was used to measure the quality and suitability of the PSP data.

Results: Nine studies were reviewed against the checklist. Based on the criteria required to inform decision-making, most studies failed to meet key criteria for regulatory submissions. One recently published study, "Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab" met most regulatory and reimbursement submission requirements.

Conclusion: Data quality validation, data source transparency, validated methodology to manage study bias, measured or unmeasured confounders, and robust outcome analysis, including sensitivity and quantitative bias analysis, are essential to ensure PSP data analysis results in successful decision-making.

根据加拿大药品管理局和加拿大卫生部公布的真实世界证据指南,审查使用加拿大患者支持方案数据进行的研究在监管和报销方面的成功情况。
患者支持计划(psp)正在全球范围内发展,以支持早期报销、疾病和药物剂量管理。在加拿大,由于缺乏公共卫生支助,促使公司支助的针对特定疾病或特定药品的psp迅速扩大。从这些项目中收集的数据产生了独特的加拿大数据,作为有价值的真实世界数据(RWD)来源,通常被欧盟和美国采用作为证据生成的来源。本综述基于加拿大药品管理局(CDA-AMC)最近发布的真实世界证据指南,评估了PSP数据在监管或报销申请中的适用性。方法:选择同行评议的出版物,评估2020年1月1日至2025年3月31日参加PSP的慢性病患者。使用CDA-AMC RWE指南中的检查表来测量PSP数据的质量和适用性。结果:9项研究根据检查表进行了审查。根据为决策提供信息所需的标准,大多数研究未能满足监管提交的关键标准。最近发表的一项研究“英夫利昔单抗的治疗药物监测”符合大多数监管和报销提交要求。结论:数据质量验证、数据源透明、有效的研究偏差管理方法、可测量或不可测量的混杂因素以及稳健的结果分析(包括敏感性和定量偏倚分析)对于确保PSP数据分析结果在成功决策中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (JPPS) is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences. JPPS is a broad-spectrum, peer-reviewed, international pharmaceutical journal circulated electronically via the World Wide Web. Subscription to JPPS is free of charge. Articles will appear individually as soon as they are accepted and are ready for circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信