A Common Representational Code for Event and Object Concepts in the Brain.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jia-Qing Tong, Jeffrey R Binder, Lisa L Conant, Stephen Mazurchuk, Andrew J Anderson, Leonardo Fernandino
{"title":"A Common Representational Code for Event and Object Concepts in the Brain.","authors":"Jia-Qing Tong, Jeffrey R Binder, Lisa L Conant, Stephen Mazurchuk, Andrew J Anderson, Leonardo Fernandino","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2166-24.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Events and objects are two fundamental ways in which humans conceptualize their experience of the world. Despite the significance of this distinction for human cognition, it remains unclear whether the neural representations of object and event concepts are categorically distinct or, instead, can be explained in terms of a shared representational code. We investigated this question by analyzing fMRI data acquired from human participants (males and females) while they rated their familiarity with the meanings of individual words (all nouns) denoting object and event concepts. Multivoxel pattern analyses indicated that both categories of lexical concepts are represented in overlapping fashion throughout the association cortex, even in the areas that showed the strongest selectivity for one or the other type in univariate contrasts. Crucially, in these areas, a feature-based model trained on neural responses to individual event concepts successfully decoded object concepts from their corresponding activation patterns (and vice versa), showing that these two categories share a common representational code. This code was effectively modeled by a set of experiential feature ratings, which also accounted for the mean activation differences between these two categories. These results indicate that neuroanatomical dissociations between events and objects emerge from quantitative differences in the cortical distribution of more fundamental features of experience. Characterizing this representational code is an important step in the development of theory-driven brain-computer interface technologies capable of decoding conceptual content directly from brain activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2166-24.2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Events and objects are two fundamental ways in which humans conceptualize their experience of the world. Despite the significance of this distinction for human cognition, it remains unclear whether the neural representations of object and event concepts are categorically distinct or, instead, can be explained in terms of a shared representational code. We investigated this question by analyzing fMRI data acquired from human participants (males and females) while they rated their familiarity with the meanings of individual words (all nouns) denoting object and event concepts. Multivoxel pattern analyses indicated that both categories of lexical concepts are represented in overlapping fashion throughout the association cortex, even in the areas that showed the strongest selectivity for one or the other type in univariate contrasts. Crucially, in these areas, a feature-based model trained on neural responses to individual event concepts successfully decoded object concepts from their corresponding activation patterns (and vice versa), showing that these two categories share a common representational code. This code was effectively modeled by a set of experiential feature ratings, which also accounted for the mean activation differences between these two categories. These results indicate that neuroanatomical dissociations between events and objects emerge from quantitative differences in the cortical distribution of more fundamental features of experience. Characterizing this representational code is an important step in the development of theory-driven brain-computer interface technologies capable of decoding conceptual content directly from brain activity.

大脑中事件和对象概念的共同表征代码。
事件和对象是人类概念化世界经验的两种基本方式。尽管这种区别对人类认知具有重要意义,但尚不清楚对象和事件概念的神经表征是绝对不同的,还是可以用共享的表征代码来解释。我们通过分析从人类参与者(男性和女性)获得的fMRI数据来调查这个问题,同时他们对表示对象和事件概念的单个单词(所有名词)的含义的熟悉程度进行评估。多体素模式分析表明,这两类词汇概念在整个联想皮层中以重叠的方式呈现,即使在单变量对比中对其中一种或另一种类型表现出最强选择性的区域也是如此。至关重要的是,在这些领域,一个基于特征的模型训练了对单个事件概念的神经反应,成功地从相应的激活模式中解码了对象概念(反之亦然),表明这两个类别共享一个共同的表征代码。该代码通过一组经验特征评级有效地建模,这也解释了这两个类别之间的平均激活差异。这些结果表明,事件和对象之间的神经解剖学分离来自于经验更基本特征的皮质分布的数量差异。表征这种表征代码是理论驱动的脑机接口技术发展的重要一步,该技术能够直接从大脑活动中解码概念内容。我们通过检查来自两个不同类别——对象和事件的单个词汇概念的神经表征,研究了词义是如何在大脑中编码的。我们发现,这两种概念在神经活动模式中被编码为一个共同的表征空间,其特征是感知和情感体验的不同模式。这表明,至少在原则上,可以使用基于可解释语义特征的概念表示生成模型从神经活动中解码来自各种语义类别的单个概念。此外,对象和事件概念都可以从先前假设的编码类别特定表征的皮层区域解码,这表明这两个类别在这些区域是共同表征的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信