An explainable machine learning model in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ming Yang, Dajian Long, Yunxiu Li, Xiaozhu Liu, Zhi Bai, Zhongjun Li
{"title":"An explainable machine learning model in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section.","authors":"Ming Yang, Dajian Long, Yunxiu Li, Xiaozhu Liu, Zhi Bai, Zhongjun Li","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2025.2546544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is recommended by obstetrical guidelines or expert consensuses. However, no valid tools can exactly predict who can have a vaginal birth among eligible candidates with one prior cesarean section. In recent years, machine learning (ML) is gradually used to develop predictive models in obstetrics and midwifery owing to its excellent performance. This study aimed to develop an explainable ML model to predict the chance of successful VBAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2438 pregnant women with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) were analyzed from two tertiary hospitals in Guangdong province of China in the final cohort. The data were collected to establish seven predicting models. Training and internal validation data were collected from the First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from January 2012 to December 2022. External validation data were collected from Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017. Seven predicting models based on ML were developed and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. The optimal one was picked out from seven models according to its AUC and other indices. The outcome of the predictive model was interpreted by Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The categorical boosting (CatBoost) model was selected as the predictive model with the greatest AUC for 0.767 (95% CI: 0.685-0.865), the accuracy for 0.652 (95% CI: 0.602-0.713), sensitivity 0.714 (95% CI: 0.576-0.840), and specificity 0.639 (95% CI: 0.574-0.70). Cervical Bishop score and interpregnancy interval showed the greatest impact on successful vaginal birth, according to SHAP results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Models based on ML algorithms can be used to predict VBAC. The CatBoost model showed best performance in this study. Based on current evidence-based medical data, clinicians should provide systematic benefit-risk analysis and individualized assessment of VBAC to eligible pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2546544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2546544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is recommended by obstetrical guidelines or expert consensuses. However, no valid tools can exactly predict who can have a vaginal birth among eligible candidates with one prior cesarean section. In recent years, machine learning (ML) is gradually used to develop predictive models in obstetrics and midwifery owing to its excellent performance. This study aimed to develop an explainable ML model to predict the chance of successful VBAC.

Methods: A total of 2438 pregnant women with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) were analyzed from two tertiary hospitals in Guangdong province of China in the final cohort. The data were collected to establish seven predicting models. Training and internal validation data were collected from the First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from January 2012 to December 2022. External validation data were collected from Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017. Seven predicting models based on ML were developed and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. The optimal one was picked out from seven models according to its AUC and other indices. The outcome of the predictive model was interpreted by Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: The categorical boosting (CatBoost) model was selected as the predictive model with the greatest AUC for 0.767 (95% CI: 0.685-0.865), the accuracy for 0.652 (95% CI: 0.602-0.713), sensitivity 0.714 (95% CI: 0.576-0.840), and specificity 0.639 (95% CI: 0.574-0.70). Cervical Bishop score and interpregnancy interval showed the greatest impact on successful vaginal birth, according to SHAP results.

Conclusions: Models based on ML algorithms can be used to predict VBAC. The CatBoost model showed best performance in this study. Based on current evidence-based medical data, clinicians should provide systematic benefit-risk analysis and individualized assessment of VBAC to eligible pregnant women.

预测剖宫产后阴道分娩的可解释机器学习模型。
目的:剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)是产科指南或专家共识推荐的。然而,没有有效的工具可以准确预测谁可以有阴道分娩的合格候选人有一次剖腹产手术。近年来,机器学习(ML)由于其优异的性能,逐渐被用于产科和助产学的预测模型开发。本研究旨在建立一个可解释的ML模型来预测VBAC成功的机会。方法:对广东省两家三级医院的2438例剖宫产后试产孕妇(TOLAC)进行最终队列分析。收集数据建立了7个预测模型。培训和内部验证数据收集自2012年1月至2022年12月广东医科大学东莞第一附属医院。外部验证数据于2011年1月至2017年12月在深圳市龙华区中心医院收集。建立了7个基于ML的预测模型,并通过受试者工作特征(AUC)曲线下面积进行了评价。根据AUC等指标,从7个模型中选出最优模型。预测模型结果采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行解释。结果:选择CatBoost模型作为预测模型,AUC为0.767 (95% CI: 0.685-0.865),准确度为0.652 (95% CI: 0.602-0.713),灵敏度为0.714 (95% CI: 0.576-0.840),特异性为0.639 (95% CI: 0.574-0.70)。根据SHAP结果,宫颈Bishop评分和解释间隔对阴道分娩成功的影响最大。结论:基于ML算法的模型可用于预测VBAC。CatBoost模型在本研究中表现最佳。基于目前的循证医学数据,临床医生应为符合条件的孕妇提供VBAC的系统获益-风险分析和个体化评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信