Fact-Checking #Breastfeeding: Analyzing TikTok Videos Related to Breastfeeding Information.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Alexa Parra, Jazmin Ramirez, Tayla von Ash, Cynthia N Lebron
{"title":"Fact-Checking #Breastfeeding: Analyzing TikTok Videos Related to Breastfeeding Information.","authors":"Alexa Parra, Jazmin Ramirez, Tayla von Ash, Cynthia N Lebron","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically characterize and fact-check breastfeeding-related content on TikTok and assess its accuracy against established evidence-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study employed quantitative content analysis to examine TikTok videos tagged with #breastfeeding to quantify breastfeeding information patterns, engagement metrics, and creator types. Only videos sharing breastfeeding information in English (regardless of country) were included. Videos were coded using a predefined framework developed by the study authors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Engagement metrics, creator type, and video accuracy.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency of videos in each category. A 1-way analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in engagement between evidence-based, non-evidence-based, or misinformation videos. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to analyze differences in engagement based on video accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 224 videos analyzed, 65% were classified as evidence-based, while 32% were non-evidence-based. Misinformation outperformed the other categories in shares, saves, and views. No significant differences in engagement metrics were found between evidence-based and non-evidence-based videos.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>These findings offer insights into how breastfeeding information is portrayed on TikTok and may inform strategies to improve the dissemination of accurate, evidence-based content on social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically characterize and fact-check breastfeeding-related content on TikTok and assess its accuracy against established evidence-based recommendations.

Design: This study employed quantitative content analysis to examine TikTok videos tagged with #breastfeeding to quantify breastfeeding information patterns, engagement metrics, and creator types. Only videos sharing breastfeeding information in English (regardless of country) were included. Videos were coded using a predefined framework developed by the study authors.

Main outcome measures: Engagement metrics, creator type, and video accuracy.

Analysis: Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency of videos in each category. A 1-way analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in engagement between evidence-based, non-evidence-based, or misinformation videos. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to analyze differences in engagement based on video accuracy.

Results: Of the 224 videos analyzed, 65% were classified as evidence-based, while 32% were non-evidence-based. Misinformation outperformed the other categories in shares, saves, and views. No significant differences in engagement metrics were found between evidence-based and non-evidence-based videos.

Conclusions and implications: These findings offer insights into how breastfeeding information is portrayed on TikTok and may inform strategies to improve the dissemination of accurate, evidence-based content on social media platforms.

事实核查#母乳喂养:分析与母乳喂养信息相关的TikTok视频。
目的:系统地描述和事实核查抖音上与母乳喂养相关的内容,并根据既定的循证建议评估其准确性。设计:本研究采用定量内容分析来检查带有#母乳喂养标签的TikTok视频,以量化母乳喂养信息模式、参与指标和创作者类型。只包括用英语分享母乳喂养信息的视频(不分国家)。视频使用研究作者开发的预定义框架进行编码。主要衡量指标:用户粘性指标、创作者类型和视频准确性。分析:采用Cohen’s kappa计算被测者信度。使用描述性统计来确定每个类别中视频的频率。采用单向方差分析来评估基于证据、非基于证据或错误信息的视频之间的参与差异。进行多变量方差分析,分析基于视频准确性的敬业度差异。结果:224个视频中,65%为循证视频,32%为非循证视频。错误信息在分享、保存和查看方面的表现优于其他类别。在基于证据和非基于证据的视频之间,用户粘性指标没有显著差异。结论和影响:这些发现为了解母乳喂养信息如何在TikTok上被描述提供了见解,并可能为改善社交媒体平台上准确、循证内容的传播提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信