Assessing Stages of Objective Memory Impairment and neuroimaging as risk factors of incident cognitive impairment.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kellen K Petersen, Ali Ezzati, Bhargav T Nallapu, Richard B Lipton, Reisa A Sperling, Kathryn V Papp, Dorene M Rentz, Keith A Johnson, Ellen Grober
{"title":"Assessing Stages of Objective Memory Impairment and neuroimaging as risk factors of incident cognitive impairment.","authors":"Kellen K Petersen, Ali Ezzati, Bhargav T Nallapu, Richard B Lipton, Reisa A Sperling, Kathryn V Papp, Dorene M Rentz, Keith A Johnson, Ellen Grober","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725101240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system, based on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), is a potential marker of subtle cognitive impairment in cognitively normal persons defined by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0. We investigated SOMI's ability to predict incident cognitive impairment (CDR >0) in combination with demographic features and neuroimaging biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitively unimpaired participants (CDR = 0) from the Harvard Aging Brain Study had baseline FCSRT scores, MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET as well as follow-up CDRs for 5 years. Cox proportional hazards models with correction for multiple testing assessed the predictive validity of SOMI and neuroimaging biomarkers for progression (CDR >0). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses examined alternative outcomes and stricter screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 231) were 73.7 years (SD = 6.0), 60.2% were female, 29.0% were APOE4 positive, and 54 (23.4%) progressed to CDR >0. At baseline, 67% were SOMI-0, 22% were SOMI-1, 4% were SOMI-2, and 7% were SOMI-3/4. After multiple testing correction, hazard ratios (HRs) using SOMI-0 as reference were: SOMI-1 = 2.06 (CI: 1.09 - 3.88), SOMI-2 = 2.85 (CI: 1.08 - 7.54), and SOMI-3/4 = 3.73 (CI: 1.58 - 8.79, <i>p</i> = 0.016). SOMI-3/4 remained significant across most biomarker models. Entorhinal thickness emerged as the most robust biomarker predictor (HR = 0.57 - 0.65, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.015). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness across alternative outcomes and stricter screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SOMI stages predict progression to incident cognitive impairment with SOMI-3/4 maintaining significance after rigorous multiple testing correction. Entorhinal thickness provides the strongest biomarker enhancement to prediction models. SOMI demonstrates substantial incremental predictive value beyond standard demographic and biomarker predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system, based on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), is a potential marker of subtle cognitive impairment in cognitively normal persons defined by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0. We investigated SOMI's ability to predict incident cognitive impairment (CDR >0) in combination with demographic features and neuroimaging biomarkers.

Methods: Cognitively unimpaired participants (CDR = 0) from the Harvard Aging Brain Study had baseline FCSRT scores, MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET as well as follow-up CDRs for 5 years. Cox proportional hazards models with correction for multiple testing assessed the predictive validity of SOMI and neuroimaging biomarkers for progression (CDR >0). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses examined alternative outcomes and stricter screening criteria.

Results: Participants (N = 231) were 73.7 years (SD = 6.0), 60.2% were female, 29.0% were APOE4 positive, and 54 (23.4%) progressed to CDR >0. At baseline, 67% were SOMI-0, 22% were SOMI-1, 4% were SOMI-2, and 7% were SOMI-3/4. After multiple testing correction, hazard ratios (HRs) using SOMI-0 as reference were: SOMI-1 = 2.06 (CI: 1.09 - 3.88), SOMI-2 = 2.85 (CI: 1.08 - 7.54), and SOMI-3/4 = 3.73 (CI: 1.58 - 8.79, p = 0.016). SOMI-3/4 remained significant across most biomarker models. Entorhinal thickness emerged as the most robust biomarker predictor (HR = 0.57 - 0.65, p ≤ 0.015). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness across alternative outcomes and stricter screening criteria.

Conclusions: SOMI stages predict progression to incident cognitive impairment with SOMI-3/4 maintaining significance after rigorous multiple testing correction. Entorhinal thickness provides the strongest biomarker enhancement to prediction models. SOMI demonstrates substantial incremental predictive value beyond standard demographic and biomarker predictors.

客观记忆障碍的评估阶段和神经影像学作为偶发性认知障碍的危险因素。
目的:基于自由提示选择性提醒测验(FCSRT)的客观记忆障碍分期(SOMI)系统是认知正常人群中以临床痴呆评分(CDR) = 0定义的微妙认知障碍的潜在标志。我们结合人口学特征和神经成像生物标志物研究了SOMI预测认知障碍(CDR >)的能力。方法:来自哈佛衰老脑研究的认知未受损参与者(CDR = 0)有基线FCSRT评分、MRI、FDG-PET和PiB-PET,以及5年的随访CDR。Cox比例风险模型对多重检验进行校正,评估了SOMI和神经成像生物标志物对进展的预测有效性(CDR >)。综合敏感性分析检查了替代结果和更严格的筛选标准。结果:参与者(N = 231),年龄73.7岁(SD = 6.0),女性60.2%,APOE4阳性29.0%,54例(23.4%)进展为CDR >。基线时,67%为SOMI-0, 22%为SOMI-1, 4%为SOMI-2, 7%为SOMI-3/4。经多次检验校正,以SOMI-0为参考的危险比(hr)为:SOMI-1 = 2.06 (CI: 1.09 ~ 3.88), SOMI-2 = 2.85 (CI: 1.08 ~ 7.54), SOMI-3/4 = 3.73 (CI: 1.58 ~ 8.79, p = 0.016)。SOMI-3/4在大多数生物标志物模型中仍然显著。内嗅厚度是最可靠的生物标志物预测因子(HR = 0.57 - 0.65, p≤0.015)。敏感性分析证实了替代结果和更严格的筛选标准的稳健性。结论:SOMI分期可预测认知功能障碍的进展,经过严格的多重测试校正后,SOMI-3/4仍具有重要意义。内嗅厚度为预测模型提供了最强的生物标志物增强。SOMI的预测价值比标准的人口统计学和生物标志物预测值有实质性的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信