Feasibility of an Online Grocery Intervention Pilot to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Purchase and Food Security Among Adults With Children Eligible for SNAP

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Angela C.B. Trude PhD , Zoya Naaz Rehman , Stefani Wiloejo MS, RDN, CDN, CNSC , Kellie McLean MPH, RDN, CDCES, BC-ADM, CDN , Laura Catalina Velasco Daza MPH , Pasquale Rummo MPH, PhD
{"title":"Feasibility of an Online Grocery Intervention Pilot to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Purchase and Food Security Among Adults With Children Eligible for SNAP","authors":"Angela C.B. Trude PhD ,&nbsp;Zoya Naaz Rehman ,&nbsp;Stefani Wiloejo MS, RDN, CDN, CNSC ,&nbsp;Kellie McLean MPH, RDN, CDCES, BC-ADM, CDN ,&nbsp;Laura Catalina Velasco Daza MPH ,&nbsp;Pasquale Rummo MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the feasibility of an online grocery pilot aimed at supporting healthy food purchases for caregivers of individuals with low income.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pretest-posttest pilot study was conducted among 59 primary household food shopper caregivers living ≤ 130% of the poverty line. The 8-week randomized pilot had 4 groups: (1) free delivery-only, (2) trust-targeting SMS, (3) matching credit for online healthy purchases, and (4) grocery list recommendations. The groups received the program concomitantly from October to December, 2022. Feasibility was assessed through the setup of an online grocery account and receipt of the intervention materials via text. Acceptability was assessed via postintervention interviews and participants’ ratings of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Feasibility was medium-high: 47% created an online grocery account, 61% watched the program tutorial. Acceptability was high: 90% found the tutorial helpful, all received text messages, 82% deemed them useful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The promising feasibility and acceptability suggest a potential for a fully powered trial behavioral intervention to support online healthy food shopping.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"57 10","pages":"Pages 989-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404625003768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the feasibility of an online grocery pilot aimed at supporting healthy food purchases for caregivers of individuals with low income.

Methods

A pretest-posttest pilot study was conducted among 59 primary household food shopper caregivers living ≤ 130% of the poverty line. The 8-week randomized pilot had 4 groups: (1) free delivery-only, (2) trust-targeting SMS, (3) matching credit for online healthy purchases, and (4) grocery list recommendations. The groups received the program concomitantly from October to December, 2022. Feasibility was assessed through the setup of an online grocery account and receipt of the intervention materials via text. Acceptability was assessed via postintervention interviews and participants’ ratings of the intervention.

Results

Feasibility was medium-high: 47% created an online grocery account, 61% watched the program tutorial. Acceptability was high: 90% found the tutorial helpful, all received text messages, 82% deemed them useful.

Conclusions and Implications

The promising feasibility and acceptability suggest a potential for a fully powered trial behavioral intervention to support online healthy food shopping.
在线杂货店干预试点的可行性,以改善水果和蔬菜的购买和食品安全的成年人有孩子符合SNAP。
目的:确定在线杂货店试点的可行性,旨在支持低收入个人护理人员购买健康食品。方法:对生活在贫困线以下130%的59名主要家庭食品购物者护理人员进行了前测后测试点研究。为期8周的随机试验分为4组:(1)免费送货,(2)以信任为目标的短信,(3)在线健康购物匹配信用,(4)购物清单推荐。这些团体在2022年10月至12月期间同时接受了该计划。可行性评估是通过建立在线杂货店账户和通过文本接收干预材料来进行的。通过干预后访谈和参与者对干预的评分来评估可接受性。结果:可行性为中高:47%的人创建了在线杂货账户,61%的人观看了该计划的教程。接受度很高:90%的人认为教程很有帮助,所有人都收到了短信,82%的人认为它们很有用。结论和意义:有希望的可行性和可接受性表明,有可能进行全面的行为干预试验,以支持在线健康食品购物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信