Jerry T Wu, Elizabeth Nowak, Jarrell Imamura, Jessica Leng, Dale Shepard, Shauna R Campbell, Jacob Scott, Lukas Nystrom, Nathan Mesko, Gary K Schwartz, Zachary D C Burke
{"title":"Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma and Myxofibrosarcoma.","authors":"Jerry T Wu, Elizabeth Nowak, Jarrell Imamura, Jessica Leng, Dale Shepard, Shauna R Campbell, Jacob Scott, Lukas Nystrom, Nathan Mesko, Gary K Schwartz, Zachary D C Burke","doi":"10.1007/s11864-025-01349-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are among the most common adult soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes. Due to their high genetic complexity, heterogeneity, and lack of specific genetic alterations, no consistent molecular targets for targeted therapy have been identified for UPS and MFS. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for UPS and MFS. However, the efficacy of ICI in UPS and MFS remains far lower than in other cancers such as melanoma. Strategies to increase the efficacy of ICI, including selecting patients based on putative biomarkers and combining ICI with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and/or radiation therapy, are currently in clinical development. In this review, we first summarize the clinical characteristics of UPS and MFS, examining the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its effect on the efficacy of ICI. We then review putative biomarkers of ICI response and highlight clinical trials testing ICI in patients with UPS and MFS. Finally, we discuss other forms of immunotherapy for UPS and MFS currently under preclinical investigation. The combination of ICI plus radiation therapy appears to have benefit for patients with localized UPS and MFS. ICI should be considered for patients with advanced or unresectable UPS and MFS, especially those with potential biomarkers of response such as tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). However, singular biomarkers such as TLS may prove inadequate to predict ICI response; more accurate prediction will likely require a panel of biomarkers including TLS, immune cell infiltration, PD-L1 expression, and other TME components.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-025-01349-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Opinion statement: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are among the most common adult soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes. Due to their high genetic complexity, heterogeneity, and lack of specific genetic alterations, no consistent molecular targets for targeted therapy have been identified for UPS and MFS. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for UPS and MFS. However, the efficacy of ICI in UPS and MFS remains far lower than in other cancers such as melanoma. Strategies to increase the efficacy of ICI, including selecting patients based on putative biomarkers and combining ICI with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and/or radiation therapy, are currently in clinical development. In this review, we first summarize the clinical characteristics of UPS and MFS, examining the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its effect on the efficacy of ICI. We then review putative biomarkers of ICI response and highlight clinical trials testing ICI in patients with UPS and MFS. Finally, we discuss other forms of immunotherapy for UPS and MFS currently under preclinical investigation. The combination of ICI plus radiation therapy appears to have benefit for patients with localized UPS and MFS. ICI should be considered for patients with advanced or unresectable UPS and MFS, especially those with potential biomarkers of response such as tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). However, singular biomarkers such as TLS may prove inadequate to predict ICI response; more accurate prediction will likely require a panel of biomarkers including TLS, immune cell infiltration, PD-L1 expression, and other TME components.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to cancer treatment.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endocrine tumors, lymphomas, neuro-oncology, and cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary region. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known oncologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.