[Liability in cases of suicide during inpatient treatment].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johannes Kornhuber, Antonia Stummvoll
{"title":"[Liability in cases of suicide during inpatient treatment].","authors":"Johannes Kornhuber, Antonia Stummvoll","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide during inpatient treatment represents distressing events for clinics and medical staff while raising questions about liability consequences. They require a differentiated approach balancing patient protection and therapeutic necessities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze long-standing case law to identify practice-relevant principles for clinical risk management regarding suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Systematic evaluation of 22 decisions from German high and supreme courts (1985-2025) concerning suicides during inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case law acknowledges the impossibility of absolute suicide prevention and grants psychiatric treatment teams considerable discretionary latitude. The legal assessment is based on the treating physician's ex-ante perspective. Specific duties of care arise in cases of acute suicidal ideation, risk situations such as therapeutic relaxations and necessary structural and organizational measures. The balance between security interests and therapeutic requirements remains central.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the clinical challenges in suicide prevention. The identified assessment standards provide orientation for the clinical practice and emphasize the necessity of individual risk assessments and documentation of all relevant decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide during inpatient treatment represents distressing events for clinics and medical staff while raising questions about liability consequences. They require a differentiated approach balancing patient protection and therapeutic necessities.

Objective: To analyze long-standing case law to identify practice-relevant principles for clinical risk management regarding suicidal ideation.

Material and methods: Systematic evaluation of 22 decisions from German high and supreme courts (1985-2025) concerning suicides during inpatient treatment.

Results: Case law acknowledges the impossibility of absolute suicide prevention and grants psychiatric treatment teams considerable discretionary latitude. The legal assessment is based on the treating physician's ex-ante perspective. Specific duties of care arise in cases of acute suicidal ideation, risk situations such as therapeutic relaxations and necessary structural and organizational measures. The balance between security interests and therapeutic requirements remains central.

Conclusion: The jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the clinical challenges in suicide prevention. The identified assessment standards provide orientation for the clinical practice and emphasize the necessity of individual risk assessments and documentation of all relevant decisions.

【住院治疗期间自杀的责任】。
背景:住院治疗期间自杀是诊所和医务人员的痛苦事件,同时提出了责任后果的问题。它们需要一种平衡患者保护和治疗需要的差异化方法。目的:分析长期以来的判例法,以确定与实践相关的自杀意念临床风险管理原则。材料和方法:系统评价德国高等法院和最高法院(1985-2025)关于住院治疗期间自杀的22项判决。结果:判例法承认绝对预防自杀是不可能的,并给予精神治疗团队相当大的自由裁量权。法律评估是基于治疗医生的事前观点。在急性自杀意念的情况下,如治疗放松和必要的结构和组织措施等风险情况下,出现了具体的护理义务。安全利益和治疗需求之间的平衡仍然是核心问题。结论:法理学证明了对自杀预防临床挑战的细致入微的理解。确定的评估标准为临床实践提供了方向,并强调了个人风险评估和所有相关决策文件的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信