Unsupervised machine learning to explore inflammation following cardiopulmonary bypass.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Enrico Squiccimarro, Roberto Lorusso, Paolo Vetuschi, Michela Rauseo, Gianluca Paternoster, Giuseppe Speziale, Richard P Whitlock, Domenico Paparella
{"title":"Unsupervised machine learning to explore inflammation following cardiopulmonary bypass.","authors":"Enrico Squiccimarro, Roberto Lorusso, Paolo Vetuschi, Michela Rauseo, Gianluca Paternoster, Giuseppe Speziale, Richard P Whitlock, Domenico Paparella","doi":"10.1177/02676591251372507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) often induces systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome (SIRS), affecting postoperative outcome. We aimed to explore adaptive/maladaptive inflammation using unsupervised machine learning.MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of 1908 adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with CPB between June 2016 and June 2020 at a single institution. Patients were assessed for SIRS 12 hours post-surgery and clustered using the partitioning around medoids (PAM) algorithm based on Gower distance. The influence of SIRS on a composite outcome comprising death, stroke/TIA, renal replacement therapy, reoperation for bleeding, mechanical circulatory support, and ICU stay >96 hours was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression.ResultsSIRS occurred in 28.7% of patients (median age 69 years; 68.7% male). Clustering revealed two subgroups: maladaptive SIRS (52.9%) with higher preoperative risk and worse outcomes, and adaptive SIRS (47.1%) with favorable outcomes. Maladaptive SIRS patients had higher 30-day mortality (21.7% vs 1.6%, p < .001). Adaptive SIRS patients had outcomes similar to SIRS-negative controls. In selected clusters, SIRS was independently associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.74, p = .002).ConclusionUnsupervised machine learning effectively identifies adaptive and maladaptive SIRS in cardiac surgery patients, providing a basis for personalized postoperative care. Several clinical and procedural factors associated with maladaptive SIRS may be modifiable, supporting future precision strategies to reduce harmful inflammation after cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591251372507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251372507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionCardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) often induces systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome (SIRS), affecting postoperative outcome. We aimed to explore adaptive/maladaptive inflammation using unsupervised machine learning.MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of 1908 adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with CPB between June 2016 and June 2020 at a single institution. Patients were assessed for SIRS 12 hours post-surgery and clustered using the partitioning around medoids (PAM) algorithm based on Gower distance. The influence of SIRS on a composite outcome comprising death, stroke/TIA, renal replacement therapy, reoperation for bleeding, mechanical circulatory support, and ICU stay >96 hours was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression.ResultsSIRS occurred in 28.7% of patients (median age 69 years; 68.7% male). Clustering revealed two subgroups: maladaptive SIRS (52.9%) with higher preoperative risk and worse outcomes, and adaptive SIRS (47.1%) with favorable outcomes. Maladaptive SIRS patients had higher 30-day mortality (21.7% vs 1.6%, p < .001). Adaptive SIRS patients had outcomes similar to SIRS-negative controls. In selected clusters, SIRS was independently associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.74, p = .002).ConclusionUnsupervised machine learning effectively identifies adaptive and maladaptive SIRS in cardiac surgery patients, providing a basis for personalized postoperative care. Several clinical and procedural factors associated with maladaptive SIRS may be modifiable, supporting future precision strategies to reduce harmful inflammation after cardiac surgery.

无监督机器学习探索体外循环后的炎症。
体外循环心脏手术(CPB)常诱发全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS),影响术后预后。我们的目标是利用无监督机器学习来探索适应性/非适应性炎症。方法:我们对2016年6月至2020年6月在同一医院接受选择性CPB心脏手术的1908例成年患者进行了事后分析。术后12小时对患者进行SIRS评估,并使用基于高尔距离的中腔周围划分(PAM)算法进行聚类。通过多变量logistic回归分析SIRS对死亡、卒中/TIA、肾脏替代治疗、出血再手术、机械循环支持和ICU住院时间bbb96小时的综合结局的影响。结果28.7%的患者发生sirs(中位年龄69岁,68.7%为男性)。聚类显示两个亚组:术前风险较高、预后较差的不适应SIRS(52.9%)和预后良好的适应SIRS(47.1%)。适应不良的SIRS患者30天死亡率更高(21.7% vs 1.6%, p < 0.001)。适应性SIRS患者的结果与SIRS阴性对照组相似。在选定的集群中,SIRS与较低的综合结局风险独立相关(OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.74, p = 0.002)。结论无监督机器学习可以有效识别心脏手术患者的适应性和不适应性SIRS,为个性化的术后护理提供依据。与适应性不良的SIRS相关的一些临床和程序因素可能是可以改变的,支持未来的精确策略来减少心脏手术后的有害炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信