Increases versus decreases: Asymmetric effects of contrast changes during binocular rivalry modulated by awareness of perceptual switch.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Changzhi Huang, Rong Jiang, Ming Meng
{"title":"Increases versus decreases: Asymmetric effects of contrast changes during binocular rivalry modulated by awareness of perceptual switch.","authors":"Changzhi Huang, Rong Jiang, Ming Meng","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.10.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The human visual system prioritizes dynamic stimuli, which attract attention and more readily break suppression to reach perceptual awareness. Here, we investigated whether dynamic changes in contrast-either increasing or decreasing-are equally effective in facilitating the breakthrough of suppressed stimuli during binocular rivalry. In Experiment 1a, we found that contrast increases led to significantly faster breakthroughs into perceptual dominance compared with decreases. Notably, increases accelerated breakthrough relative to the unchanged baseline, whereas decreases delayed it. Experiments 1b and 1c replicated the results of Experiment 1a using, respectively, a briefer contrast change (10 ms instead of 100 ms) and partial breakthrough reports, confirming a robust asymmetry in the processing of suppressed stimuli between increases and decreases. In Experiment 2a, random dots moving in different random directions were presented dichoptically, making interocular conflict imperceptible and unreportable. We found that any change in intensity in such rivalry settings-regardless of increase or decrease-promoted perceptual dominance. By introducing motion stimuli into the Experiment 1 paradigm, Experiment 2b demonstrated that the divergence between Experiments 1 and 2 was not due to low-level stimulus differences. Taken together, our results reveal an asymmetric effect of contrast changes during binocular rivalry. This finding highlights the interplay between subliminal sensory processing of contrast changes and conscious awareness, shedding light on developing theoretical models of binocular rivalry.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 10","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.10.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human visual system prioritizes dynamic stimuli, which attract attention and more readily break suppression to reach perceptual awareness. Here, we investigated whether dynamic changes in contrast-either increasing or decreasing-are equally effective in facilitating the breakthrough of suppressed stimuli during binocular rivalry. In Experiment 1a, we found that contrast increases led to significantly faster breakthroughs into perceptual dominance compared with decreases. Notably, increases accelerated breakthrough relative to the unchanged baseline, whereas decreases delayed it. Experiments 1b and 1c replicated the results of Experiment 1a using, respectively, a briefer contrast change (10 ms instead of 100 ms) and partial breakthrough reports, confirming a robust asymmetry in the processing of suppressed stimuli between increases and decreases. In Experiment 2a, random dots moving in different random directions were presented dichoptically, making interocular conflict imperceptible and unreportable. We found that any change in intensity in such rivalry settings-regardless of increase or decrease-promoted perceptual dominance. By introducing motion stimuli into the Experiment 1 paradigm, Experiment 2b demonstrated that the divergence between Experiments 1 and 2 was not due to low-level stimulus differences. Taken together, our results reveal an asymmetric effect of contrast changes during binocular rivalry. This finding highlights the interplay between subliminal sensory processing of contrast changes and conscious awareness, shedding light on developing theoretical models of binocular rivalry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

增加与减少:双眼竞争中对比度变化的不对称效应由知觉转换的意识调节。
人类视觉系统优先考虑动态刺激,这些刺激能吸引注意力,更容易打破抑制,达到感知。在这里,我们研究了对比度的动态变化(增加或减少)是否同样有效地促进了双眼竞争中抑制刺激的突破。在实验 1a中,我们发现对比度的增加比减少明显更快地导致知觉优势的突破。值得注意的是,相对于不变的基线,加速突破的增加,而延迟突破的减少。实验1b和1c分别使用更短的对比变化(10 ms而不是100 ms)和部分突破报告重复了实验1a的结果,证实了抑制刺激在增加和减少之间的处理中存在强大的不对称性。在实验2a中,在不同的随机方向上运动的随机点被双视呈现,使得眼间冲突不可感知和不可报告。我们发现,在这种竞争环境中,任何强度的变化——无论是增加还是减少——都会促进感知优势。实验2b通过将运动刺激引入实验1范式,证明了实验1和实验2的差异不是由低水平刺激差异引起的。综上所述,我们的研究结果揭示了双目竞争中对比度变化的不对称效应。这一发现强调了对比度变化的阈下感觉加工与意识意识之间的相互作用,为双目竞争的理论模型的发展提供了线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信