Transitioning into informal care and occupational self-efficacy : A difference-in-differences propensity score matching analysis using representative German employee data.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Carolin Kunz
{"title":"Transitioning into informal care and occupational self-efficacy : A difference-in-differences propensity score matching analysis using representative German employee data.","authors":"Carolin Kunz","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02481-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to demographic ageing, the number of care receivers has been rising, while the number of caregivers is decreasing in many countries. Informal caregiving often begins while still in active employment often leading to role conflicts. The dual burden can negatively affect job performance and lead to changes in occupational self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite being of high relevance for individuals, organizations and society, there is a research gap concerning occupational self-efficacy, which may serve as a mechanism for reduced working hours or exit from the labor market after taking on care responsibilities. Thus, this article analyzes the impact of transitioning into informal caregiving on occupational self-efficacy longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included the 2017, 2019 and 2021 waves of the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Working Time Survey, which is a representative panel study of employees in Germany. For each respondent, two waves were used (n ≥ 3052). Difference-in-differences (DiD) models with the transition into informal care with distinctions of different care frequencies as the treatment variables were calculated. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the DID models, transitioning into at least occasionally caregiving had a negative effect on occupational self-efficacy, leading to a significant deterioration in composure in the face of occupational difficulties, ideas for solving problems at work and the ability to cope with most occupational demands. The results based on PSM supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With respect to, e.g., skilled labor shortages and challenges for welfare systems, sustaining employees' working ability including occupational self-efficacy is of utmost relevance in ageing societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02481-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to demographic ageing, the number of care receivers has been rising, while the number of caregivers is decreasing in many countries. Informal caregiving often begins while still in active employment often leading to role conflicts. The dual burden can negatively affect job performance and lead to changes in occupational self-efficacy.

Objective: Despite being of high relevance for individuals, organizations and society, there is a research gap concerning occupational self-efficacy, which may serve as a mechanism for reduced working hours or exit from the labor market after taking on care responsibilities. Thus, this article analyzes the impact of transitioning into informal caregiving on occupational self-efficacy longitudinally.

Material and methods: This study included the 2017, 2019 and 2021 waves of the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Working Time Survey, which is a representative panel study of employees in Germany. For each respondent, two waves were used (n ≥ 3052). Difference-in-differences (DiD) models with the transition into informal care with distinctions of different care frequencies as the treatment variables were calculated. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied.

Results: Based on the DID models, transitioning into at least occasionally caregiving had a negative effect on occupational self-efficacy, leading to a significant deterioration in composure in the face of occupational difficulties, ideas for solving problems at work and the ability to cope with most occupational demands. The results based on PSM supported these findings.

Conclusion: With respect to, e.g., skilled labor shortages and challenges for welfare systems, sustaining employees' working ability including occupational self-efficacy is of utmost relevance in ageing societies.

过渡到非正式关怀和职业自我效能感:使用具有代表性的德国员工数据的差异倾向得分匹配分析。
背景:由于人口老龄化,在许多国家,接受护理的人数一直在上升,而照顾者的人数却在减少。非正式的照顾往往是在积极就业时开始的,经常导致角色冲突。双重负担会对工作绩效产生负向影响,导致职业自我效能感的变化。目的:尽管职业自我效能感对个人、组织和社会都具有很高的相关性,但职业自我效能感可能是承担照顾责任后减少工作时间或退出劳动力市场的一种机制,存在研究空白。因此,本文从纵向角度分析了向非正式照顾过渡对职业自我效能的影响。材料和方法:本研究包括2017年,2019年和2021年联邦职业安全与健康研究所(BAuA)工作时间调查的浪潮,这是德国员工的代表性小组研究。对于每个应答者,使用两波(n ≥3052)。以不同护理频率的差异作为治疗变量,计算过渡到非正式护理的差异中差异(DiD)模型。为了控制选择偏差,采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)。结果:基于DID模型,过渡到至少偶尔的照顾会对职业自我效能产生负面影响,导致面对职业困难时的镇静、解决工作问题的想法和应对大部分职业需求的能力显著下降。基于PSM的结果支持了这些发现。结论:考虑到熟练劳动力短缺和福利制度面临的挑战,在老龄化社会中,维持员工的工作能力(包括职业自我效能感)是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信