Luebeck Scale of Basic Mobility among geriatric hospital patients: LSBM and timed LSBM.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sonja Krupp, Julia Müller, Meike Kasten, Jennifer Kasper
{"title":"Luebeck Scale of Basic Mobility among geriatric hospital patients: LSBM and timed LSBM.","authors":"Sonja Krupp, Julia Müller, Meike Kasten, Jennifer Kasper","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02484-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Luebeck Scale of Basic Mobility (LSBM) assesses seven phases of mobility from the prone position to walking. It was validated on geriatric patients who were unable to complete the timed up and go test (TUG). It showed no floor effect. A ceiling effect is to be assumed for more mobile patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test whether additional measurement of the time required for the transfers (→ t-LSBM) in more mobile patients results in a change-sensitive instrument and what time requirement can be expected for the individual tasks.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In geriatric patients who had completed the TUG on admission to hospital, the LSBM including the time required for the transfers and the TUG were recorded twice with an interval of at least 10 days. The correlations between severity, transfer time and TUG were calculated, as well as the effect size for sensitivity to change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 85 patients (65.9% women) aged 81.6 ± 6.0 years were recruited, 75 of whom were available for the follow-up examination after a mean of 12.9 days. The sum score of the LSBM decreased from 5.00 ± 2.94 to 3.28 ± 2.23 (p < 0.001), the cumulative time required in the t‑LSBM from 60.3 ± 26.2 to 46.2 ± 18.8 s with a nearly identical effect size of 0.77. This was 0.56 for the TUG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LSBM is highly sensitive to change even in patients who are able to walk. If all tasks can be completed independently, a supplementary time recording (→ t-LSBM) is recommended to prevent a ceiling effect. This creates a mobility test that is suitable for all geriatric hospital patients and provides the information on mobility in the room required for therapy and discharge planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02484-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Luebeck Scale of Basic Mobility (LSBM) assesses seven phases of mobility from the prone position to walking. It was validated on geriatric patients who were unable to complete the timed up and go test (TUG). It showed no floor effect. A ceiling effect is to be assumed for more mobile patients.

Objective: To test whether additional measurement of the time required for the transfers (→ t-LSBM) in more mobile patients results in a change-sensitive instrument and what time requirement can be expected for the individual tasks.

Material and methods: In geriatric patients who had completed the TUG on admission to hospital, the LSBM including the time required for the transfers and the TUG were recorded twice with an interval of at least 10 days. The correlations between severity, transfer time and TUG were calculated, as well as the effect size for sensitivity to change.

Results: In this study 85 patients (65.9% women) aged 81.6 ± 6.0 years were recruited, 75 of whom were available for the follow-up examination after a mean of 12.9 days. The sum score of the LSBM decreased from 5.00 ± 2.94 to 3.28 ± 2.23 (p < 0.001), the cumulative time required in the t‑LSBM from 60.3 ± 26.2 to 46.2 ± 18.8 s with a nearly identical effect size of 0.77. This was 0.56 for the TUG.

Conclusion: The LSBM is highly sensitive to change even in patients who are able to walk. If all tasks can be completed independently, a supplementary time recording (→ t-LSBM) is recommended to prevent a ceiling effect. This creates a mobility test that is suitable for all geriatric hospital patients and provides the information on mobility in the room required for therapy and discharge planning.

老年医院患者基本活动能力Luebeck量表:按时间排序和按时间排序。
背景:吕贝克基本活动能力量表(Luebeck Scale of Basic Mobility, LSBM)评估从俯卧位到步行的七个活动阶段。它在老年患者身上得到了验证,这些患者无法完成计时和去测试(TUG)。它没有显示出地板效应。对于流动性较大的患者,假设存在天花板效应。目的:测试更多移动患者转移所需时间(→t-LSBM)的额外测量是否会导致仪器的变化敏感,以及个体任务的预期时间需求。材料和方法:在入院时完成TUG的老年患者中,记录两次LSBM,包括转院所需时间和TUG,间隔至少为10天。计算了严重程度、转移时间和TUG之间的相关性,以及对变化敏感性的效应大小。结果:本研究共招募85例患者(65.9%为女性),年龄81.6 ±6.0岁,其中75例患者平均随访时间为12.9天。LSBM的总评分从5.00 ±2.94下降到3.28 ±2.23 (p )结论:即使在能够行走的患者中,LSBM对变化也高度敏感。如果所有任务都可以独立完成,建议补充时间记录(→t-LSBM),以防止天花板效应。这创建了一个适合所有老年医院患者的活动能力测试,并提供了治疗和出院计划所需的房间活动能力信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信