Practice for adolescent stuttering: a review of medical records from a Swedish cohort.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sandra Pagoldh, Tove Edmar Lagerberg
{"title":"Practice for adolescent stuttering: a review of medical records from a Swedish cohort.","authors":"Sandra Pagoldh, Tove Edmar Lagerberg","doi":"10.1080/14015439.2025.2553239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Stuttering, during adolescence, may influence adult life. However, little is known about currently applied clinical procedures for assessment and treatment of stuttering in adolescence.</p><p><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim of the present study was to investigate clinicians' assessment and intervention routines and if choice of intervention was related to factors such as age, gender, or stuttering severity.</p><p><p><b>Method:</b> Medical records from 51 adolescents who had visited a Speech and Language Therapy clinic were included. Group differences were analysed through nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and correlations through Spearman's correlation test.</p><p><p><b>Results and conclusions:</b> Most of the participants were assessed through subjective severity ratings or descriptions in free text and no formal treatment evaluation was performed. All participants received treatment in line with evidenced based practice for adults who stutter. There was a significant difference in number of sessions related to gender and overt stuttering severity but not to age. The clinicians rely on their clinical expertise regarding assessment of overt symptoms and impact of stuttering which may be a deliberate choice related to the need of their clients and ethical considerations. The inconsistent use of assessment tools hindered treatment evaluation, which is desirable to ensure optimal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49903,"journal":{"name":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2025.2553239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stuttering, during adolescence, may influence adult life. However, little is known about currently applied clinical procedures for assessment and treatment of stuttering in adolescence.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate clinicians' assessment and intervention routines and if choice of intervention was related to factors such as age, gender, or stuttering severity.

Method: Medical records from 51 adolescents who had visited a Speech and Language Therapy clinic were included. Group differences were analysed through nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and correlations through Spearman's correlation test.

Results and conclusions: Most of the participants were assessed through subjective severity ratings or descriptions in free text and no formal treatment evaluation was performed. All participants received treatment in line with evidenced based practice for adults who stutter. There was a significant difference in number of sessions related to gender and overt stuttering severity but not to age. The clinicians rely on their clinical expertise regarding assessment of overt symptoms and impact of stuttering which may be a deliberate choice related to the need of their clients and ethical considerations. The inconsistent use of assessment tools hindered treatment evaluation, which is desirable to ensure optimal care.

青少年口吃的实践:对瑞典队列医疗记录的回顾。
背景:青春期的口吃可能会影响成年后的生活。然而,目前对评估和治疗青少年口吃的临床程序知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是调查临床医生的评估和干预程序,以及干预的选择是否与年龄、性别或口吃严重程度等因素有关。方法:对51名曾到言语语言治疗诊所就诊的青少年进行病历分析。组间差异分析采用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验,相关性分析采用Spearman相关检验。结果和结论:大多数参与者通过主观严重程度评分或自由文本描述进行评估,没有进行正式的治疗评估。所有参与者都接受了基于证据的成人口吃治疗。与性别和明显口吃严重程度相关的会话次数有显著差异,但与年龄无关。临床医生依靠他们的临床专业知识来评估明显的症状和口吃的影响,这可能是与他们的客户的需要和道德考虑有关的故意选择。评估工具的不一致使用阻碍了治疗评估,这是确保最佳护理的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology is an amalgamation of the former journals Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics & Phoniatrics and VOICE. The intention is to cover topics related to speech, language and voice pathology as well as normal voice function in its different aspects. The Journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Phonation and laryngeal physiology Speech and language development Voice disorders Clinical measurements of speech, language and voice Professional voice including singing Bilingualism Cleft lip and palate Dyslexia Fluency disorders Neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics Aphasia Motor speech disorders Voice rehabilitation of laryngectomees Augmentative and alternative communication Acoustics Dysphagia Publications may have the form of original articles, i.e. theoretical or methodological studies or empirical reports, of reviews of books and dissertations, as well as of short reports, of minor or ongoing studies or short notes, commenting on earlier published material. Submitted papers will be evaluated by referees with relevant expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信