Clinical safety study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture in elderly patients: a new strategy for the treatment of stones.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hai-Wen Ye, Fei Liu, Dai-Jiao Gu, Jie Liao, Rong-Sen Huang, Jun-Jiang Pan
{"title":"Clinical safety study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture in elderly patients: a new strategy for the treatment of stones.","authors":"Hai-Wen Ye, Fei Liu, Dai-Jiao Gu, Jie Liao, Rong-Sen Huang, Jun-Jiang Pan","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03146-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture (LBEPS) offers advantages such as minimal invasion, shorter operative time, and faster postoperative recovery in the treatment of common bile duct stones.However, its safety in elderly patients remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 128 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent LBEPS treatment in our hospital from December 2018 to March 2025.The patients were divided into an elderly group (≥ 65years, n = 55) and a non-elderly group (< 65years, n = 73) based on age.Baseline characteristics, operative time, postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and other indicators were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, such as sex, body mass index(BMI), or stone diameter, between the two groups (P > 0.05). The diameter of the common bile duct was significantly larger in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), total bilirubi (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), white blood cells (WBC), haemoglobin (HGB), or platelet (PLT) levels between the two groups before and after surgery(P > 0.05). However, the postoperative drainage time and total hospital stay were longer in the elderly group (P < 0.05). The presence of hepatitis B was identified as an independent risk factor for complications after LBEPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical application of LBEPS in elderly patients with common bile duct stones is safe and feasible.Elderly patients require a longer preoperative length of stay compared to non-elderly patients.Patients with common bile duct stones and concomitant hepatitis B are more prone to complications after LBEPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03146-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture (LBEPS) offers advantages such as minimal invasion, shorter operative time, and faster postoperative recovery in the treatment of common bile duct stones.However, its safety in elderly patients remains controversial.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 128 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent LBEPS treatment in our hospital from December 2018 to March 2025.The patients were divided into an elderly group (≥ 65years, n = 55) and a non-elderly group (< 65years, n = 73) based on age.Baseline characteristics, operative time, postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and other indicators were compared between the two groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, such as sex, body mass index(BMI), or stone diameter, between the two groups (P > 0.05). The diameter of the common bile duct was significantly larger in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), total bilirubi (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), white blood cells (WBC), haemoglobin (HGB), or platelet (PLT) levels between the two groups before and after surgery(P > 0.05). However, the postoperative drainage time and total hospital stay were longer in the elderly group (P < 0.05). The presence of hepatitis B was identified as an independent risk factor for complications after LBEPS.

Conclusion: The clinical application of LBEPS in elderly patients with common bile duct stones is safe and feasible.Elderly patients require a longer preoperative length of stay compared to non-elderly patients.Patients with common bile duct stones and concomitant hepatitis B are more prone to complications after LBEPS.

Abstract Image

老年患者腹腔镜胆总管探查及一期缝合的临床安全性研究:治疗结石的新策略。
背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查及一期缝合(LBEPS)治疗胆总管结石具有微创、手术时间短、术后恢复快等优点。然而,其在老年患者中的安全性仍存在争议。方法:回顾性分析2018年12月至2025年3月我院行LBEPS治疗的128例胆总管结石患者的临床资料。将患者分为老年组(≥65岁,n = 55)和非老年组(结果:两组在性别、体重指数(BMI)、结石直径等基线特征上无显著差异(P < 0.05)。老年组胆总管直径明显大于非老年组(P < 0.05)。结论:LBEPS在老年胆总管结石患者中的临床应用是安全可行的。与非老年患者相比,老年患者需要更长的术前停留时间。胆总管结石合并乙型肝炎患者在LBEPS后更容易出现并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信