Joyce Zhang, Kuang-Yi Wen, Jessica Liang, Victoria Diamond, Sandra Dayaratna
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Based Self-sampling in Underserved Minorities in the United States: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Joyce Zhang, Kuang-Yi Wen, Jessica Liang, Victoria Diamond, Sandra Dayaratna","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the review evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in underscreened communities to increase cervical cancer screening rates in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches were conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the following search terms: HPV or human papillomavirus viruses, self-sampling, self-swabbing, or self-collection, acceptability, feasibility, and United States. The study aims to identify factors related to the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in this scoping review. Most studies reviewed associated factors, such as demographic data (age and ethnicity), and socioeconomic data (income, education level, and insurance status). There was a higher HPV self-sampling rate (75%-100%) in the 11 studies where there was an in-person component including completing self-sampling kits in-person after recruitment, scheduled appointments or education sessions compared with studies where kits were returned by mail (3%-93%). Eleven studies measured acceptability and/or feasibility, and subjects reported the self-sampling process and devices were acceptable and easy to use. Of the 11 that measured feasibility and acceptability, 3 studies noted that the majority preferred self-sampling over clinician-collected Pap tests. Six studies incorporated community health worker-led education prior to distributing self-sampling kits, and improved attitudes toward self-sampling. Two studies evaluated the incidence of abnormal results between self-sampling and clinician-collected Pap test and found no difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPV self-sampling is seen as an acceptable and feasible option for cervical cancer screening for underscreened individuals. Furthermore, patient-facing education components led by community health workers greatly influenced participants' decision to self-sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"348-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the review evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in underscreened communities to increase cervical cancer screening rates in the United States.
Methods: Database searches were conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the following search terms: HPV or human papillomavirus viruses, self-sampling, self-swabbing, or self-collection, acceptability, feasibility, and United States. The study aims to identify factors related to the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling uptake.
Results: Sixteen studies were included in this scoping review. Most studies reviewed associated factors, such as demographic data (age and ethnicity), and socioeconomic data (income, education level, and insurance status). There was a higher HPV self-sampling rate (75%-100%) in the 11 studies where there was an in-person component including completing self-sampling kits in-person after recruitment, scheduled appointments or education sessions compared with studies where kits were returned by mail (3%-93%). Eleven studies measured acceptability and/or feasibility, and subjects reported the self-sampling process and devices were acceptable and easy to use. Of the 11 that measured feasibility and acceptability, 3 studies noted that the majority preferred self-sampling over clinician-collected Pap tests. Six studies incorporated community health worker-led education prior to distributing self-sampling kits, and improved attitudes toward self-sampling. Two studies evaluated the incidence of abnormal results between self-sampling and clinician-collected Pap test and found no difference.
Conclusions: HPV self-sampling is seen as an acceptable and feasible option for cervical cancer screening for underscreened individuals. Furthermore, patient-facing education components led by community health workers greatly influenced participants' decision to self-sample.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus.
The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning.
The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care.
The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.