Middle meningeal artery embolization with SwiftPAC coils for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matthew Webb, Anqi Luo, George Tomy Naratadam, Michael Blaine Gaub, Fadi Al Saiegh, Lee A Birnbaum, Justin R Mascitelli
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery embolization with SwiftPAC coils for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas.","authors":"Matthew Webb, Anqi Luo, George Tomy Naratadam, Michael Blaine Gaub, Fadi Al Saiegh, Lee A Birnbaum, Justin R Mascitelli","doi":"10.1177/15910199251370824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveMiddle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has been shown to lower recurrence and reoperation rates of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the initial use, safety, and effectiveness of SwiftPAC (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) coils for MMAE.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive MMAE performed with SwiftPAC coils for in patients with cSDHs. Liquid or particle embolization was excluded. Selection criteria for adjunct versus stand-alone MMAE were based on clinical judgement. Outcome measures included were a decrease in size of the cSDH, decreased size >50%, midline shift, reoccurrence or progression, retreatment, clinical stability or symptom improvement, and procedure-related complications.ResultsTwenty-three patients/31 hemispheres received MMAEs (eight bilateral and 15 unilateral) with SwiftPAC coils. Twenty-two patients (96%) had clinical and radiographic follow-up (median 54 days), and one patient was lost to follow-up. Sixteen (69.6%) MMAEs were performed as an adjunct to surgical drainage; seven (30.4%) were stand-alone MMAEs. No procedural-related complications were observed. Clinical stability or symptom improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 95.4% of patients (21/22). Radiographic improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 93.3% (28/30). Nineteen (63.3%) cSDHs had a decrease in size >50% and nine cSDHs (30%) demonstrated complete resolution. One patient required retreatment for recurrence.ConclusionsMMAE with SwiftPAC coils can be performed with a high safety profile and good radiographic and clinical outcomes. Given the small size and no comparison cohort, further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251370824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251370824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveMiddle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has been shown to lower recurrence and reoperation rates of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the initial use, safety, and effectiveness of SwiftPAC (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) coils for MMAE.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive MMAE performed with SwiftPAC coils for in patients with cSDHs. Liquid or particle embolization was excluded. Selection criteria for adjunct versus stand-alone MMAE were based on clinical judgement. Outcome measures included were a decrease in size of the cSDH, decreased size >50%, midline shift, reoccurrence or progression, retreatment, clinical stability or symptom improvement, and procedure-related complications.ResultsTwenty-three patients/31 hemispheres received MMAEs (eight bilateral and 15 unilateral) with SwiftPAC coils. Twenty-two patients (96%) had clinical and radiographic follow-up (median 54 days), and one patient was lost to follow-up. Sixteen (69.6%) MMAEs were performed as an adjunct to surgical drainage; seven (30.4%) were stand-alone MMAEs. No procedural-related complications were observed. Clinical stability or symptom improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 95.4% of patients (21/22). Radiographic improvement at follow-up was demonstrated in 93.3% (28/30). Nineteen (63.3%) cSDHs had a decrease in size >50% and nine cSDHs (30%) demonstrated complete resolution. One patient required retreatment for recurrence.ConclusionsMMAE with SwiftPAC coils can be performed with a high safety profile and good radiographic and clinical outcomes. Given the small size and no comparison cohort, further research is warranted.

SwiftPAC线圈栓塞脑膜中动脉治疗慢性硬膜下血肿。
目的脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAE)可降低慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDHs)的复发率和再手术率。本研究的目的是证明SwiftPAC (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA)线圈用于MMAE的初始使用、安全性和有效性。方法采用SwiftPAC线圈对cSDHs患者进行连续MMAE的回顾性研究。排除液体或颗粒栓塞。辅助与独立MMAE的选择标准基于临床判断。结果测量包括cSDH体积减小、体积减小50%、中线移位、复发或进展、再治疗、临床稳定性或症状改善以及手术相关并发症。结果采用SwiftPAC线圈进行MMAEs治疗的患者共23例/31个脑半球,其中8例为双侧,15例为单侧。22例患者(96%)进行了临床和影像学随访(中位54天),1例患者失访。16例(69.6%)MMAEs作为手术引流的辅助;7例(30.4%)为独立mmae。未见手术相关并发症。95.4%的患者在随访中表现出临床稳定或症状改善(21/22)。随访时影像学改善率为93.3%(28/30)。19例(63.3%)cSDHs缩小50%,9例(30%)cSDHs完全消退。1例患者因复发需要再治疗。结论采用SwiftPAC线圈进行smmae具有较高的安全性和良好的影像学和临床效果。由于研究规模小且没有比较队列,进一步的研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信