Concept of Depth of Invasion can Improve Staging Performance in Patients with Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Won-Gun Yun, Yoon Soo Chae, Youngmin Han, Young Jae Cho, Hye-Sol Jung, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Haeryoung Kim, Kyoung Bun Lee, Jin-Young Jang
{"title":"Concept of Depth of Invasion can Improve Staging Performance in Patients with Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.","authors":"Won-Gun Yun, Yoon Soo Chae, Youngmin Han, Young Jae Cho, Hye-Sol Jung, Wooil Kwon, Joon Seong Park, Haeryoung Kim, Kyoung Bun Lee, Jin-Young Jang","doi":"10.4143/crt.2025.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC) has evolved significantly. However, the prognostic correlation of the newly proposed staging system remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the staging performance between AJCC 7th and 8th editions for dCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We reviewed pathological slides of consecutive patients who underwent resection for dCC between 2000 and 2022. According to the AJCC 8th edition, depth of invasion was defined as the distance from the basement membrane of adjacent normal or dysplastic epithelium to the deepest tumor invasion. We analyzed changes in the T category from the AJCC 7th to 8th edition and assessed overall survival and recurrence based on these staging systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 428 patients, application of the 8th edition resulted in down-staging of 272 (63.6%) patients and up-staging of only 13 (3.0%). Lymph node metastases were identified in 150 (35.1%) patients, with 29 (6.8%) having ≥ 4 metastatic nodes. The C-indices for overall survival and recurrence are 0.557 and 0.569 for the T stage of the AJCC 7th edition, and 0.606 and 0.631 for that of the AJCC 8th edition (95% confidence interval for delta: 0.005-0.092 for survival, 0.023-0.100 for recurrence). Additionally, the T category of the 8th edition correlated more strongly with lymph node metastases than that of the 7th edition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In dCC, the T category of the AJCC 8th edition demonstrates improved prognostic correlation and better alignment with lymph node metastases compared to that of the 7th edition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC) has evolved significantly. However, the prognostic correlation of the newly proposed staging system remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the staging performance between AJCC 7th and 8th editions for dCC.

Materials and methods: We reviewed pathological slides of consecutive patients who underwent resection for dCC between 2000 and 2022. According to the AJCC 8th edition, depth of invasion was defined as the distance from the basement membrane of adjacent normal or dysplastic epithelium to the deepest tumor invasion. We analyzed changes in the T category from the AJCC 7th to 8th edition and assessed overall survival and recurrence based on these staging systems.

Results: Among 428 patients, application of the 8th edition resulted in down-staging of 272 (63.6%) patients and up-staging of only 13 (3.0%). Lymph node metastases were identified in 150 (35.1%) patients, with 29 (6.8%) having ≥ 4 metastatic nodes. The C-indices for overall survival and recurrence are 0.557 and 0.569 for the T stage of the AJCC 7th edition, and 0.606 and 0.631 for that of the AJCC 8th edition (95% confidence interval for delta: 0.005-0.092 for survival, 0.023-0.100 for recurrence). Additionally, the T category of the 8th edition correlated more strongly with lymph node metastases than that of the 7th edition.

Conclusion: In dCC, the T category of the AJCC 8th edition demonstrates improved prognostic correlation and better alignment with lymph node metastases compared to that of the 7th edition.

侵袭深度的概念可以改善远端胆管癌切除患者的分期:美国癌症分期系统联合委员会的验证
目的:美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)对远端胆管癌(dCC)的分期系统发生了重大变化。然而,新提出的分期系统的预后相关性尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在比较AJCC第7版和第8版对dCC的分期性能。材料和方法:我们回顾了2000年至2022年间连续接受dCC切除术的患者的病理切片。根据AJCC第8版,浸润深度定义为邻近正常或发育不良上皮基底膜到肿瘤最深处浸润的距离。我们分析了从AJCC第7版到第8版T类的变化,并基于这些分期系统评估了总生存率和复发率。结果:在428例患者中,应用第8版导致272例(63.6%)患者降期,仅13例(3.0%)患者升期。150例(35.1%)患者有淋巴结转移,29例(6.8%)患者有≥4个转移淋巴结。AJCC 7期T期总生存期和复发率的c指数分别为0.557和0.569,AJCC 8期总生存期和复发率的c指数分别为0.606和0.631 (δ的95%置信区间:生存期为0.005-0.092,复发率为0.023-0.100)。此外,与第7版相比,第8版的T类与淋巴结转移的相关性更强。结论:在dCC中,与AJCC第7版相比,AJCC第8版的T分类与预后的相关性更好,与淋巴结转移的一致性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信