Expertise in Gynecological Pathology Impacts Diagnosis of Atypical Glandular Cell Category in Cervical Cytology.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000912
Havva Gökce Terzioglu, Alessa Aragao, Julieta E Barroeta
{"title":"Expertise in Gynecological Pathology Impacts Diagnosis of Atypical Glandular Cell Category in Cervical Cytology.","authors":"Havva Gökce Terzioglu, Alessa Aragao, Julieta E Barroeta","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Pap test is effective for detecting squamous neoplasia, but the interpretation of atypical glandular cell (AGC) remains challenging because of its rarity, complex cytologic features, and interobserver variability. Although AGC represents a small proportion of Pap test diagnoses, it often leads to extensive follow-up. This study aimed to assess whether gynecologic pathology expertise improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces unnecessary interventions in AGC interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of AGC cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2024 at the authors' institution was conducted. Among 107,615 Pap smears, 301 (0.28%) were initially classified as AGC. Of these, 221 had slides available for review, and 184 had adequate histologic follow-up. Cases were re-evaluated by a cytopathologist with additional gynecologic pathology training, blinded to clinical information, and reclassified according to the Bethesda System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reclassification identified 62 cases as AGC, 1 as adenocarcinoma in situ, and 4 as adenocarcinoma. The remaining 117 cases were reassigned to other diagnostic categories. The malignancy rate increased from 39.1% to 53.9%, and the positive predictive value for significant histologic findings was 59.7%. Cytology-histology concordance improved from 26.6% to 64.1% ( p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gynecologic pathology expertise enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of AGC, improved malignancy detection, and significantly increased cytohistologic correlation. While decreasing sensitivity, it increases positive predictive value of AGC interpretation. These findings highlight the value of specialized training and the need for a specific, criteria-based approach to minimize unnecessary follow-up and optimize patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"297-303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Pap test is effective for detecting squamous neoplasia, but the interpretation of atypical glandular cell (AGC) remains challenging because of its rarity, complex cytologic features, and interobserver variability. Although AGC represents a small proportion of Pap test diagnoses, it often leads to extensive follow-up. This study aimed to assess whether gynecologic pathology expertise improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces unnecessary interventions in AGC interpretation.

Methods: A retrospective review of AGC cases diagnosed between 2014 and 2024 at the authors' institution was conducted. Among 107,615 Pap smears, 301 (0.28%) were initially classified as AGC. Of these, 221 had slides available for review, and 184 had adequate histologic follow-up. Cases were re-evaluated by a cytopathologist with additional gynecologic pathology training, blinded to clinical information, and reclassified according to the Bethesda System.

Results: Reclassification identified 62 cases as AGC, 1 as adenocarcinoma in situ, and 4 as adenocarcinoma. The remaining 117 cases were reassigned to other diagnostic categories. The malignancy rate increased from 39.1% to 53.9%, and the positive predictive value for significant histologic findings was 59.7%. Cytology-histology concordance improved from 26.6% to 64.1% ( p = .002).

Conclusions: Gynecologic pathology expertise enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of AGC, improved malignancy detection, and significantly increased cytohistologic correlation. While decreasing sensitivity, it increases positive predictive value of AGC interpretation. These findings highlight the value of specialized training and the need for a specific, criteria-based approach to minimize unnecessary follow-up and optimize patient care.

妇科病理专业知识影响宫颈细胞学中非典型腺细胞类别的诊断。
目的:巴氏涂片检查对于检测鳞状肿瘤是有效的,但非典型腺细胞(AGC)的解释仍然具有挑战性,因为它的罕见性、复杂的细胞学特征和观察者之间的可变性。虽然AGC只占巴氏试验诊断的一小部分,但它经常导致广泛的随访。本研究旨在评估妇科病理专业知识是否能提高诊断准确性并减少AGC解释中不必要的干预。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2014 - 2024年诊断的AGC病例。在107,615份巴氏涂片检查中,301份(0.28%)最初被归类为AGC。其中221例有可复查的载玻片,184例有充分的组织学随访。病例由接受额外妇科病理学培训的细胞病理学家重新评估,不了解临床信息,并根据Bethesda系统重新分类。结果:重新分类62例为AGC, 1例为原位腺癌,4例为腺癌。其余117例被重新分配到其他诊断类别。恶性肿瘤发生率由39.1%上升至53.9%,显著组织学表现的阳性预测值为59.7%。细胞学-组织学一致性从26.6%提高到64.1% (p = 0.002)。结论:妇科病理专业知识提高了AGC的诊断准确性,改善了恶性肿瘤的检测,并显著提高了细胞组织学相关性。在降低敏感性的同时,增加了AGC解释的阳性预测值。这些发现强调了专业培训的价值,以及需要一种具体的、基于标准的方法来减少不必要的随访和优化患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信