Effect of 10 and 20 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position on surgical field quality during ear surgery. A randomized-controlled trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
H S El-Ozairy, M R Naguib, A M Abd-Elmaksoud, O M Mady
{"title":"Effect of 10 and 20 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position on surgical field quality during ear surgery. A randomized-controlled trial.","authors":"H S El-Ozairy, M R Naguib, A M Abd-Elmaksoud, O M Mady","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Middle ear surgeries are better executed under controlled hypotension. Reverse-Trendelenburg (RTP) position has been used in endoscopic sinus surgeries as a safe and cost-free method to reduce intraoperative bleeding. However, it has not been tried in ear surgery due to surgical field accessibility concerns. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two RTP angles (10 and 20 degrees) on quality of surgical field and surgical position accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 225 adult patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 50years, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective middle ear surgery were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. All patients were anesthetized using the same protocol. Patients were randomly and evenly allocated to one of three groups, 75 patients each; group I (control) patients were positioned supine, group II patients were positioned 10̊ RTP position and group III patients were positioned 20̊ RTP position. The surgeons were asked to assess the surgical field using a 5-point scale. The surgeon satisfaction concerning surgical position accessibility was evaluated using a 5-point scale. Total dexmedetomidine consumption, recovery time, surgical time and analgesia time were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality of surgical field was significantly different among the three groups (P-value<0.001), being best in group III. Surgeon's satisfaction score was found to be statistically insignificant among the three study groups (P-value=0.251).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that 10 and 20-degree RTP provided a significantly better surgical field quality without considerably affecting accessibility and decreased intraoperative dexmedetomidine consumption shortening the recovery time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.07.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Middle ear surgeries are better executed under controlled hypotension. Reverse-Trendelenburg (RTP) position has been used in endoscopic sinus surgeries as a safe and cost-free method to reduce intraoperative bleeding. However, it has not been tried in ear surgery due to surgical field accessibility concerns. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two RTP angles (10 and 20 degrees) on quality of surgical field and surgical position accessibility.

Methods: In total, 225 adult patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 50years, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective middle ear surgery were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, controlled study. All patients were anesthetized using the same protocol. Patients were randomly and evenly allocated to one of three groups, 75 patients each; group I (control) patients were positioned supine, group II patients were positioned 10̊ RTP position and group III patients were positioned 20̊ RTP position. The surgeons were asked to assess the surgical field using a 5-point scale. The surgeon satisfaction concerning surgical position accessibility was evaluated using a 5-point scale. Total dexmedetomidine consumption, recovery time, surgical time and analgesia time were recorded.

Results: The quality of surgical field was significantly different among the three groups (P-value<0.001), being best in group III. Surgeon's satisfaction score was found to be statistically insignificant among the three study groups (P-value=0.251).

Conclusion: This study showed that 10 and 20-degree RTP provided a significantly better surgical field quality without considerably affecting accessibility and decreased intraoperative dexmedetomidine consumption shortening the recovery time.

耳科手术中10度和20度逆位对手术视野质量的影响。一项随机对照试验。
目的:在控制低血压的条件下进行中耳手术效果较好。逆trendelenburg (RTP)位作为一种安全、无成本的减少术中出血的方法已被应用于内镜鼻窦手术。然而,由于手术野的可及性问题,它尚未在耳科手术中试用。本研究的主要目的是评估两个RTP角度(10度和20度)对手术视野质量和手术位置可及性的影响。方法:225名年龄在18岁至50岁之间,ASA I-II级,计划择期中耳手术的成年男女患者被纳入这项随机、前瞻性、对照研究。所有患者均采用相同的麻醉方案。患者被随机均匀地分为三组,每组75例;I组(对照组)患者取仰卧位,II组患者取10个RTP位,III组患者取20个RTP位。要求外科医生用5分制评估手术视野。采用5分制评估外科医生对手术体位可及性的满意度。记录右美托咪定总消耗量、恢复时间、手术时间和镇痛时间。结果:三组手术视野质量差异有统计学意义(p值)。结论:10度和20度RTP在不显著影响可及性的情况下,手术视野质量明显改善,术中右美托咪定用量减少,恢复时间缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
28.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site. Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信