Effectiveness of different exercise interventions on balance and cognitive functions in stroke patients: A network meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Minghui Du, Longwei Chen, Liang Xia, Yunan Li, Enyi Ma, Zhiwei Hu, Xu Gao
{"title":"Effectiveness of different exercise interventions on balance and cognitive functions in stroke patients: A network meta-analysis.","authors":"Minghui Du, Longwei Chen, Liang Xia, Yunan Li, Enyi Ma, Zhiwei Hu, Xu Gao","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01267-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise interventions are proven to improve functional outcomes in stroke patients, yet the optimal and safest exercise modalities remain uncertain. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to systematically compare the effects of various exercise interventions on balance and cognitive functions, providing robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating exercise interventions for balance and cognitive improvements in stroke patients were included. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by Bayesian NMA using Stata 15.0 and R 4.41.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study ultimately included 40 RCTs with 2,302 patients. Six commonly employed exercise interventions in clinical treatment were covered, including aerobic exercise (AE), core stability exercise (CSE), physical/mental exercise (PME), resistance training (RT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and mixed-component exercise (Mixed). According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), Mixed was the most effective intervention for improving Berg balance scale scores (SUCRA = 82.89%). AE was the most effective intervention for improving patients' performance on the timed up and go test (SUCRA = 88.46%). PME exhibited superior effectiveness in improving Montreal cognitive assessment scores (SUCRA = 86.43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed and AE noticeably improves balance function in stroke patients, while PME and AE notably enhance cognitive function. The efficacy of other forms of exercise requires further validation. For patients whose primary objective is to improve balance, we recommend prioritizing Mixed. In cases of markedly impaired physical function, a single type of exercise should be selected. For patients aiming to enhance cognitive function, we recommend the selection of PME as the preferred option.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registration date: 23 September 2024. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024593741.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01267-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise interventions are proven to improve functional outcomes in stroke patients, yet the optimal and safest exercise modalities remain uncertain. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to systematically compare the effects of various exercise interventions on balance and cognitive functions, providing robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making.

Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating exercise interventions for balance and cognitive improvements in stroke patients were included. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by Bayesian NMA using Stata 15.0 and R 4.41.

Results: This study ultimately included 40 RCTs with 2,302 patients. Six commonly employed exercise interventions in clinical treatment were covered, including aerobic exercise (AE), core stability exercise (CSE), physical/mental exercise (PME), resistance training (RT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and mixed-component exercise (Mixed). According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), Mixed was the most effective intervention for improving Berg balance scale scores (SUCRA = 82.89%). AE was the most effective intervention for improving patients' performance on the timed up and go test (SUCRA = 88.46%). PME exhibited superior effectiveness in improving Montreal cognitive assessment scores (SUCRA = 86.43%).

Conclusions: Mixed and AE noticeably improves balance function in stroke patients, while PME and AE notably enhance cognitive function. The efficacy of other forms of exercise requires further validation. For patients whose primary objective is to improve balance, we recommend prioritizing Mixed. In cases of markedly impaired physical function, a single type of exercise should be selected. For patients aiming to enhance cognitive function, we recommend the selection of PME as the preferred option.

Trial registration: Registration date: 23 September 2024. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024593741.

不同运动干预对脑卒中患者平衡和认知功能的影响:网络荟萃分析。
背景:运动干预已被证明可以改善脑卒中患者的功能结局,但最佳和最安全的运动方式仍不确定。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在系统比较各种运动干预对平衡和认知功能的影响,为指导临床决策提供有力证据。方法:检索截至2024年9月的Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library。随机对照试验(rct)评估运动干预对卒中患者平衡和认知改善的作用。采用Stata 15.0和R 4.41进行质量评价和数据提取,然后进行贝叶斯NMA分析。结果:本研究最终纳入40项随机对照试验,共2302例患者。研究涵盖了临床治疗中常用的六种运动干预措施,包括有氧运动(AE)、核心稳定性运动(CSE)、身心运动(PME)、阻力训练(RT)、高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和混合成分运动(Mixed)。从累积排名曲线下曲面(SUCRA)来看,混合型干预对改善Berg平衡量表得分最有效(SUCRA = 82.89%)。AE是改善患者在time up and go测试中的表现最有效的干预措施(SUCRA = 88.46%)。PME对蒙特利尔认知评估得分的改善效果显著(SUCRA = 86.43%)。结论:混合和AE可显著改善脑卒中患者的平衡功能,而PME和AE可显著改善脑卒中患者的认知功能。其他形式的运动的功效需要进一步验证。对于主要目的是改善平衡的患者,我们建议优先考虑混合型。在身体功能明显受损的情况下,应选择单一类型的运动。对于旨在增强认知功能的患者,我们建议选择PME作为首选方案。试验注册:注册日期:2024年9月23日。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024593741。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信