Activity of upper-limb muscles during therapeutic climbing: a cross-sectional comparison between fractured and healthy individuals.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yaming Liu, Bing Li, Fengxian Wu, Chenglong Feng, Lejun Wang, Bin Chen, Wenxin Niu
{"title":"Activity of upper-limb muscles during therapeutic climbing: a cross-sectional comparison between fractured and healthy individuals.","authors":"Yaming Liu, Bing Li, Fengxian Wu, Chenglong Feng, Lejun Wang, Bin Chen, Wenxin Niu","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01311-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic climbing (TC) is an emerging physical therapy with demonstrated benefits for musculoskeletal rehabilitation, but its impact on upper-limb muscle activity remains unclear. Existing research predominantly focuses on healthy individuals, leaving muscle recruitment strategies in patients with upper-limb injuries largely unexplored. This study aims to investigate upper-limb muscle activity in patients with unilateral upper-limb injuries and healthy individuals across six TC exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven patients with right upper-limb fractures and 15 healthy controls were recruited. The electromyographic temporal patterns, activation intensity, bilateral symmetry, and synergy patterns of anterior deltoid (AD), posterior deltoid (PD), biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), pronator teres (PT), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) were assessed during elbow and knee flexion-extension exercises and four sequential climbing exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AD, BB, and PT exhibited greater activation during climbing, while TB was more active in elbow flexion-extension (p < 0.05). Climbing showed lower similarity ([Formula: see text] = 0.72, lag = -3.40%) than flexion-extension (0.80, 1.36%), which was influenced by climbing sequences: starting with the injured side resulted in 0.85 similarity and 1.71% delay, while starting with the uninjured side reduced similarity to 0.6 and increased delay to 7%. Patients exhibited lower activation intensity than controls in AD (p = 0.048), BB (p = 0.017), TB (p = 0.006), and PT (p < 0.01), and greater asymmetry, especially in PT (p < 0.01). Two synergy patterns explained the > 94% variance in both groups. Patients showed altered synergy patterns with increased AD and reduced forearm activation intensity during climbing (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients exhibited delayed muscle activation, decreased activation similarity and intensity, as well as specific compensatory patterns, which were related to both the injury locations and the types of exercises performed. Flexion-extension exercises are more suitable for early rehabilitation. Climbing exercises require greater muscle activation, with climbing starting from the injured side being more suitable for advanced rehabilitation stages. However, injury-induced compensation must be carefully considered in program design.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01311-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic climbing (TC) is an emerging physical therapy with demonstrated benefits for musculoskeletal rehabilitation, but its impact on upper-limb muscle activity remains unclear. Existing research predominantly focuses on healthy individuals, leaving muscle recruitment strategies in patients with upper-limb injuries largely unexplored. This study aims to investigate upper-limb muscle activity in patients with unilateral upper-limb injuries and healthy individuals across six TC exercises.

Methods: Eleven patients with right upper-limb fractures and 15 healthy controls were recruited. The electromyographic temporal patterns, activation intensity, bilateral symmetry, and synergy patterns of anterior deltoid (AD), posterior deltoid (PD), biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), pronator teres (PT), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) were assessed during elbow and knee flexion-extension exercises and four sequential climbing exercises.

Results: AD, BB, and PT exhibited greater activation during climbing, while TB was more active in elbow flexion-extension (p < 0.05). Climbing showed lower similarity ([Formula: see text] = 0.72, lag = -3.40%) than flexion-extension (0.80, 1.36%), which was influenced by climbing sequences: starting with the injured side resulted in 0.85 similarity and 1.71% delay, while starting with the uninjured side reduced similarity to 0.6 and increased delay to 7%. Patients exhibited lower activation intensity than controls in AD (p = 0.048), BB (p = 0.017), TB (p = 0.006), and PT (p < 0.01), and greater asymmetry, especially in PT (p < 0.01). Two synergy patterns explained the > 94% variance in both groups. Patients showed altered synergy patterns with increased AD and reduced forearm activation intensity during climbing (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Patients exhibited delayed muscle activation, decreased activation similarity and intensity, as well as specific compensatory patterns, which were related to both the injury locations and the types of exercises performed. Flexion-extension exercises are more suitable for early rehabilitation. Climbing exercises require greater muscle activation, with climbing starting from the injured side being more suitable for advanced rehabilitation stages. However, injury-induced compensation must be carefully considered in program design.

治疗攀爬期间上肢肌肉活动:骨折与健康个体的横断面比较
背景:治疗性攀爬(TC)是一种新兴的物理疗法,已被证明对肌肉骨骼康复有益,但其对上肢肌肉活动的影响尚不清楚。现有的研究主要集中在健康个体上,上肢损伤患者的肌肉补充策略在很大程度上未被探索。本研究旨在探讨单侧上肢损伤患者和健康人的上肢肌肉活动情况。方法:选取右上肢骨折患者11例,健康对照15例。在肘关节和膝关节屈伸运动和四次连续攀爬运动中评估前三角肌(AD)、后三角肌(PD)、肱二头肌(BB)、肱三头肌(TB)、旋前圆肌(PT)、桡腕屈肌(FCR)和尺腕屈肌(FCU)的肌电图时间模式、激活强度、双侧对称性和协同模式。结果:AD、BB和PT在攀爬时表现出更大的激活,而TB在肘关节屈伸时更活跃(两组差异均为94%)。结论:患者表现出肌肉激活延迟,激活相似度和强度降低,以及特定的代偿模式,这与损伤部位和运动类型有关。屈伸练习更适合早期康复。攀爬运动需要更多的肌肉活动,从受伤的一侧开始攀爬更适合高级康复阶段。然而,在程序设计中必须仔细考虑伤害引起的赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信