Magnitude of neonatal mortality and its association with maternal and child health care in sub-Saharan africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Belayneh Hamdela Jena, Mesfin Menza Jaldo, Yohannes Yirga Demesa, Biruk Assefa Kebede, Lamesginew Mossie Melaku
{"title":"Magnitude of neonatal mortality and its association with maternal and child health care in sub-Saharan africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Belayneh Hamdela Jena, Mesfin Menza Jaldo, Yohannes Yirga Demesa, Biruk Assefa Kebede, Lamesginew Mossie Melaku","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01710-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal mortality remains a problem in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Findings of primary studies varied in magnitude of neonatal mortality, characteristics of the study population, and association of maternal and child health care with neonatal mortality. Thus, this review was aimed at estimating the pooled magnitude of neonatal mortality and its association with maternal and child health care in SSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Hinari for health via Research4Life) and gray literature sources were accessed. Relevant studies were retrieved from related studies via snowballing. A combination of medical subject headings (MeSH terms) using Boolean operators and key words related to neonatal mortality were used to search studies. Full-text articles published from observational studies in SSA included. Heterogeneity was assessed using a forest plot and Higgins's I<sup>2</sup> test. When heterogeneity was evident, a sensitivity and subgroup analysis were done. A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled effect sizes. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's regression test. A trim and fill analysis was considered when publication bias exists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 studies were included to answer the review questions. The pooled neonatal mortality rate among live births was 32 per 1,000 live births (95% CI: 25, 42), and among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units was 16.5% (95% CI: 13.9, 19.5%) in SSA. Lack of antenatal care visits [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.98], giving childbirth outside of a health institution or home [OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.84], and late initiation of breastfeeding [OR = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.98, 6.15] increased the odds of neonatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neonatal mortality in SSA remains high. Maternal health services such as exposure to antenatal care and institutional delivery and child health services such as early initiation of breastfeeding were related to reducing the burden of neonatal mortality. Thus, much effort and commitment are needed to achieve the United Nations' sustainable development goal of reducing neonatal mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01710-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains a problem in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Findings of primary studies varied in magnitude of neonatal mortality, characteristics of the study population, and association of maternal and child health care with neonatal mortality. Thus, this review was aimed at estimating the pooled magnitude of neonatal mortality and its association with maternal and child health care in SSA.

Methods: Databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Hinari for health via Research4Life) and gray literature sources were accessed. Relevant studies were retrieved from related studies via snowballing. A combination of medical subject headings (MeSH terms) using Boolean operators and key words related to neonatal mortality were used to search studies. Full-text articles published from observational studies in SSA included. Heterogeneity was assessed using a forest plot and Higgins's I2 test. When heterogeneity was evident, a sensitivity and subgroup analysis were done. A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled effect sizes. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's regression test. A trim and fill analysis was considered when publication bias exists.

Results: A total of 57 studies were included to answer the review questions. The pooled neonatal mortality rate among live births was 32 per 1,000 live births (95% CI: 25, 42), and among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units was 16.5% (95% CI: 13.9, 19.5%) in SSA. Lack of antenatal care visits [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.98], giving childbirth outside of a health institution or home [OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.84], and late initiation of breastfeeding [OR = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.98, 6.15] increased the odds of neonatal mortality.

Conclusions: Neonatal mortality in SSA remains high. Maternal health services such as exposure to antenatal care and institutional delivery and child health services such as early initiation of breastfeeding were related to reducing the burden of neonatal mortality. Thus, much effort and commitment are needed to achieve the United Nations' sustainable development goal of reducing neonatal mortality.

撒哈拉以南非洲新生儿死亡率及其与妇幼保健的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:新生儿死亡率仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的一个问题。初步研究的结果在新生儿死亡率的大小、研究人群的特征以及孕产妇和儿童保健与新生儿死亡率的关系方面各不相同。因此,本综述旨在估计SSA新生儿死亡率及其与妇幼保健的关系。方法:检索PubMed、ScienceDirect和Hinari health via Research4Life数据库和灰色文献。通过滚雪球法从相关研究中检索相关研究。使用布尔运算符的医学主题标题(MeSH术语)和与新生儿死亡率相关的关键词的组合用于搜索研究。包括发表于SSA观察性研究的全文文章。异质性评估采用森林样地和希金斯I2检验。当异质性明显时,进行敏感性和亚组分析。采用加权逆方差随机效应模型估计合并效应大小。采用漏斗图和Egger回归检验评估发表偏倚。当存在发表偏倚时,考虑进行修剪和填充分析。结果:共纳入57项研究来回答综述问题。在SSA中,活产新生儿的总死亡率为每1,000活产32例(95% CI: 25, 42),在新生儿重症监护病房住院的新生儿中,新生儿死亡率为16.5% (95% CI: 13.9, 19.5%)。缺乏产前保健访问[比值比(OR) = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.98],在医疗机构或家中以外分娩[OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.84],以及较晚开始母乳喂养[OR = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.98, 6.15]增加了新生儿死亡的几率。结论:SSA的新生儿死亡率仍然很高。孕产妇保健服务,如接受产前护理和机构分娩,以及儿童保健服务,如早期开始母乳喂养,都与减轻新生儿死亡率负担有关。因此,要实现联合国降低新生儿死亡率的可持续发展目标,需要作出大量努力和承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信