Christopher P Barlett, Douglas A Gentile, Angline Khoo, Robin Kowalski, Tracy E Waasdorp
{"title":"The Predictors and Consequences of Cyberbullying Perpetration and Cyber-Victimization: The Development of a New Cyberbullying Theory.","authors":"Christopher P Barlett, Douglas A Gentile, Angline Khoo, Robin Kowalski, Tracy E Waasdorp","doi":"10.1002/jad.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extensive research has demonstrated the deleterious effects of both cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization on youth and adults alike. Most research, to date, is segmented into focusing on the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration or the outcomes of being cyber-victimized, which presents an incomplete theoretical understanding of cyberbullying. Therefore, the current research tests a novel theory that combines both literatures and operationalizes cyberbullying perpetration and cyber-victimization as mediators: the Integrative Cyberbullying Theory (ICBT). The ICBT posits the mediating influence of both cyberbullying perpetration and victimization on the relationship between predictors (e.g., traditional perpetration, traditional victimization, risky online behavior) and later psychological outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, loneliness) in a single comprehensive model, which addresses key gaps in the theoretical understanding of cyberbullying predictors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study 1 sampled 369 US adolescents using a cross-sectional design, and Study 2 sampled 1137 Singaporean adolescents using a four-wave longitudinal design, with a time lag separated by 1 year. Participants in both studies completed validated measures of traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying, cyber-victimization, depression, risky online behavior, anxiety, and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Path modeling procedures showed support for the ICBT in both studies. Indeed, our ICBT models fit the data well and showed several significant direct relationships. Moreover, cyberbullying perpetration and victimization mediated the relationships between several predictors and outcomes. Overall, our path modeling findings suggest that cyberbullying perpetration and victimization can be theoretical mediators that link various predicts and consequences-a novel idea that has practical implications in addition to theoretical gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Extensive research has demonstrated the deleterious effects of both cyberbullying perpetration and cyberbullying victimization on youth and adults alike. Most research, to date, is segmented into focusing on the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration or the outcomes of being cyber-victimized, which presents an incomplete theoretical understanding of cyberbullying. Therefore, the current research tests a novel theory that combines both literatures and operationalizes cyberbullying perpetration and cyber-victimization as mediators: the Integrative Cyberbullying Theory (ICBT). The ICBT posits the mediating influence of both cyberbullying perpetration and victimization on the relationship between predictors (e.g., traditional perpetration, traditional victimization, risky online behavior) and later psychological outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, loneliness) in a single comprehensive model, which addresses key gaps in the theoretical understanding of cyberbullying predictors and outcomes.
Methods: Study 1 sampled 369 US adolescents using a cross-sectional design, and Study 2 sampled 1137 Singaporean adolescents using a four-wave longitudinal design, with a time lag separated by 1 year. Participants in both studies completed validated measures of traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying, cyber-victimization, depression, risky online behavior, anxiety, and loneliness.
Results and conclusion: Path modeling procedures showed support for the ICBT in both studies. Indeed, our ICBT models fit the data well and showed several significant direct relationships. Moreover, cyberbullying perpetration and victimization mediated the relationships between several predictors and outcomes. Overall, our path modeling findings suggest that cyberbullying perpetration and victimization can be theoretical mediators that link various predicts and consequences-a novel idea that has practical implications in addition to theoretical gains.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.