Visual versus verbal: Assessing probe efficacy across modality and time delays in the Concealed Information Test.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Yi-Chen Tsai, Yu-Hui Lo, Philip Tseng
{"title":"Visual versus verbal: Assessing probe efficacy across modality and time delays in the Concealed Information Test.","authors":"Yi-Chen Tsai, Yu-Hui Lo, Philip Tseng","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01784-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Concealed Information Test (CIT), also known as the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), is a method of deception detection by presenting the suspects with familiar stimuli that only the culprits would recognize. Because recognition memory is crucial to the success of reaction time-based CIT, in this study we investigated how pictorial and verbal crime-related items (i.e., Probes) of a visually experienced mock crime would perform against time delay and memory deterioration. Participants visually encoded the details of a theft mock crime from a first-person perspective and were randomly assigned to one of the Probe modalities (i.e., verbal vs. pictorial) group and one of the time delays (immediate vs. 2-week delay) group: immediate verbal, immediate pictorial, 2-week verbal, 2-week pictorial. We observed significant Probe-Irrelevant RT difference in all 4 conditions. When we evaluated the ability of each condition to differentiate between guilty and innocent by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, we observed a significant effect of time delay, with higher AUCs in the immediate condition compared to the 2-week delay, and no difference between verbal and pictorial modalities. Together, our results suggest that for visually experienced events, CIT effects can be observed 1) both with pictorial or verbal Probes, 2) both immediately and after 2 weeks, and 3) importantly, although pictorial and verbal Probes perform equally well, a 2-week delay would cost CIT efficacy in AUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01784-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Concealed Information Test (CIT), also known as the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), is a method of deception detection by presenting the suspects with familiar stimuli that only the culprits would recognize. Because recognition memory is crucial to the success of reaction time-based CIT, in this study we investigated how pictorial and verbal crime-related items (i.e., Probes) of a visually experienced mock crime would perform against time delay and memory deterioration. Participants visually encoded the details of a theft mock crime from a first-person perspective and were randomly assigned to one of the Probe modalities (i.e., verbal vs. pictorial) group and one of the time delays (immediate vs. 2-week delay) group: immediate verbal, immediate pictorial, 2-week verbal, 2-week pictorial. We observed significant Probe-Irrelevant RT difference in all 4 conditions. When we evaluated the ability of each condition to differentiate between guilty and innocent by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, we observed a significant effect of time delay, with higher AUCs in the immediate condition compared to the 2-week delay, and no difference between verbal and pictorial modalities. Together, our results suggest that for visually experienced events, CIT effects can be observed 1) both with pictorial or verbal Probes, 2) both immediately and after 2 weeks, and 3) importantly, although pictorial and verbal Probes perform equally well, a 2-week delay would cost CIT efficacy in AUC.

视觉与语言:评估隐藏信息测试中不同形式和时间延迟的探针效能。
隐藏信息测试(CIT),也被称为犯罪知识测试(GKT),是一种通过向嫌疑人提供只有罪犯才能识别的熟悉刺激来检测欺骗的方法。由于识别记忆对基于反应时间的CIT的成功至关重要,因此本研究探讨了视觉体验模拟犯罪的图像和语言犯罪相关项目(即探针)对时间延迟和记忆退化的影响。参与者以第一人称视角对盗窃模拟犯罪的细节进行视觉编码,并被随机分配到一个探查模式组(即口头与图像)和一个时间延迟组(即时与2周延迟):即时口头、即时图像、2周口头、2周图像。在所有4种情况下,我们观察到探针无关RT的显著差异。当我们用受试者工作特征分析计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估每个条件下区分有罪和无罪的能力时,我们观察到时间延迟的显著影响,即时条件下的AUC比两周延迟高,而语言和图像模式之间没有差异。总之,我们的研究结果表明,对于视觉体验事件,CIT效应可以通过1)图像或语言探针观察到,2)立即和2周后都可以观察到,3)重要的是,尽管图像和语言探针表现同样好,但2周的延迟会使CIT在AUC中的效果降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信