Does immobilisation improve outcomes in proximal tibial stress fractures among military recruits?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christopher Martin, B Park, B M Wheatley
{"title":"Does immobilisation improve outcomes in proximal tibial stress fractures among military recruits?","authors":"Christopher Martin, B Park, B M Wheatley","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal tibial stress fractures (PTSFs) are a significant cause of morbidity in military recruits, often requiring prolonged rehabilitation and leading to attrition from training. Despite their impact, little data exist to guide optimal treatment strategies, and most recommendations are extrapolated from diaphyseal tibial stress fractures. This study aims to describe fracture characteristics, treatment protocols and outcomes of Marine Corps recruits diagnosed with PTSFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of Marine recruits at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego-an all-male training centre during the data collection period (2019-2021)-with MRI-confirmed PTSF. Patients who were initially treated non-operatively were included in this study. MRI and radiograph characteristics, age, bilateral or unilateral injury, treatment protocols (casting vs protected weight bearing) and outcomes-including return to full duty (RTFD) or separation-were evaluated. Statistical analyses included χ<sup>2</sup>testing, t-tests and logistic and linear regression modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 patients (105 total fractures) met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 20 years. 25 patients had bilateral fractures. No patient initially treated non-operatively progressed to require surgery. PTSFs demonstrated a high likelihood of military separation, with over one in four eventually separating and an average time to disposition of 121 days. There were no statistically significant predictors of RTFD or ultimate disposition based on treating provider's specialty, casting or fracture characteristics. A trend towards decreased return to duty in bilateral fractures did not reach significance. Of the 21 separations, eight were directly attributable to the stress fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Marine recruits with PTSFs, conservative management without casting is safe and effective, even in bilateral cases or those with extensive fracture morphology. Outcomes were similar regardless of treating provider specialty. Casting offered no additional benefit and may be unnecessary in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proximal tibial stress fractures (PTSFs) are a significant cause of morbidity in military recruits, often requiring prolonged rehabilitation and leading to attrition from training. Despite their impact, little data exist to guide optimal treatment strategies, and most recommendations are extrapolated from diaphyseal tibial stress fractures. This study aims to describe fracture characteristics, treatment protocols and outcomes of Marine Corps recruits diagnosed with PTSFs.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of Marine recruits at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego-an all-male training centre during the data collection period (2019-2021)-with MRI-confirmed PTSF. Patients who were initially treated non-operatively were included in this study. MRI and radiograph characteristics, age, bilateral or unilateral injury, treatment protocols (casting vs protected weight bearing) and outcomes-including return to full duty (RTFD) or separation-were evaluated. Statistical analyses included χ2testing, t-tests and logistic and linear regression modelling.

Results: 80 patients (105 total fractures) met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 20 years. 25 patients had bilateral fractures. No patient initially treated non-operatively progressed to require surgery. PTSFs demonstrated a high likelihood of military separation, with over one in four eventually separating and an average time to disposition of 121 days. There were no statistically significant predictors of RTFD or ultimate disposition based on treating provider's specialty, casting or fracture characteristics. A trend towards decreased return to duty in bilateral fractures did not reach significance. Of the 21 separations, eight were directly attributable to the stress fracture.

Conclusion: In Marine recruits with PTSFs, conservative management without casting is safe and effective, even in bilateral cases or those with extensive fracture morphology. Outcomes were similar regardless of treating provider specialty. Casting offered no additional benefit and may be unnecessary in most cases.

固定能改善新兵胫骨近端应力性骨折的预后吗?
引言:胫骨近端应力性骨折(ptsf)是新兵发病率的重要原因,通常需要长时间的康复并导致训练损耗。尽管它们有影响,但指导最佳治疗策略的数据很少,大多数建议是从胫骨骨干应力性骨折推断出来的。本研究旨在探讨创伤后应激障碍新兵的骨折特征、治疗方案及预后。方法:在数据收集期间(2019-2021年),对圣地亚哥海军陆战队招募站(一个全男性训练中心)的海军陆战队新兵进行回顾性审查,mri确认PTSF。最初接受非手术治疗的患者被纳入本研究。评估MRI和x线片特征、年龄、双侧或单侧损伤、治疗方案(浇头或保护负重)和结果(包括恢复正常工作(RTFD)或分离)。统计分析包括χ2检验、t检验、logistic和线性回归模型。结果:80例患者(105例)符合纳入标准,平均年龄20岁。25例患者双侧骨折。最初非手术治疗的患者没有进展到需要手术。ptsf表现出很高的军事分离可能性,超过四分之一的人最终分离,平均时间为121天。根据治疗提供者的专业、铸造或骨折特征,没有统计学上显著的RTFD或最终处置的预测因子。双侧骨折患者复职率下降的趋势没有明显意义。在21个分离中,8个直接归因于应力断裂。结论:对于海军新兵ptsf,即使是双侧骨折或骨折形态广泛的病例,保守治疗也安全有效。无论治疗提供者的专业如何,结果相似。铸造没有提供额外的好处,在大多数情况下可能是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信