Understanding the Theories and Frameworks That Guide Occupational Therapy Practice With Black Populations: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Amanda Dos Santos Pereira, Khalilah Robinson Johnson, Lilian Magalhães
{"title":"Understanding the Theories and Frameworks That Guide Occupational Therapy Practice With Black Populations: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Amanda Dos Santos Pereira, Khalilah Robinson Johnson, Lilian Magalhães","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.051068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Globally, the occupational therapy profession has neglected to address the anti-Black racism in its therapeutic services. Although discussions on ethnic/racial issues have grown in the field in recent years, few studies have investigated the theoretical and methodological frameworks that inform the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe and analyze the theoretical and methodological frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners who provide services to Black populations.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles published in English and Portuguese from 2013 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data collection: </strong>Scoping review procedures as outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were used to identify articles that reflect theoretical and methodological frameworks that guide the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were organized into four themes: humanities and social sciences: theories and frameworks; occupation-centered approaches; addressing systemic inequalities through collective occupations, intersectionality, and the incorporation of Black epistemologies into occupational therapy practices; and methodological approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Findings suggest that occupational therapy practitioners must adopt an antiracist approach with Black populations and be guided by counterhegemonic and decolonial frameworks. More studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of frameworks that guide therapeutic practices with Black populations. Plain-Language Summary: This scoping review interrogates anti-Black racism in occupational therapy practice and the relevant frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners working with Black populations around the world. The authors identify practice and research gaps that remain in the discourse and provide pathways for action that address the needs and demands of these populations from an antiracist lens. Positionality Statement: The authors are Black, cisgender, heterosexual, female-identifying occupational therapy practitioners and academic activists who engage in research and practice at the intersections of antiracism, gender, and ableism in occupational therapy and occupational science. The first and third authors live in different regions of Brazil and speak Portuguese. The first author is from a state in northeastern Brazil, which has the largest percentage of Black residents outside the African continent. The third author is from southeastern Brazil, a region with a significant percentage of White individuals. The second author is from the southern United States, is a native English speaker, and has practiced, taught, and conducted research with Black populations in the United States. These social markers shape how we do everyday life, being members of the Black community in our respective countries, belonging to an antiracist movement, and becoming transformative agents to change approaches to engaging with Black occupational therapy service recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Globally, the occupational therapy profession has neglected to address the anti-Black racism in its therapeutic services. Although discussions on ethnic/racial issues have grown in the field in recent years, few studies have investigated the theoretical and methodological frameworks that inform the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.

Objective: To describe and analyze the theoretical and methodological frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners who provide services to Black populations.

Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles published in English and Portuguese from 2013 to 2024.

Study selection and data collection: Scoping review procedures as outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were used to identify articles that reflect theoretical and methodological frameworks that guide the practices of occupational therapy practitioners who work with Black populations.

Findings: Forty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were organized into four themes: humanities and social sciences: theories and frameworks; occupation-centered approaches; addressing systemic inequalities through collective occupations, intersectionality, and the incorporation of Black epistemologies into occupational therapy practices; and methodological approaches.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings suggest that occupational therapy practitioners must adopt an antiracist approach with Black populations and be guided by counterhegemonic and decolonial frameworks. More studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness and limitations of frameworks that guide therapeutic practices with Black populations. Plain-Language Summary: This scoping review interrogates anti-Black racism in occupational therapy practice and the relevant frameworks available to occupational therapy practitioners working with Black populations around the world. The authors identify practice and research gaps that remain in the discourse and provide pathways for action that address the needs and demands of these populations from an antiracist lens. Positionality Statement: The authors are Black, cisgender, heterosexual, female-identifying occupational therapy practitioners and academic activists who engage in research and practice at the intersections of antiracism, gender, and ableism in occupational therapy and occupational science. The first and third authors live in different regions of Brazil and speak Portuguese. The first author is from a state in northeastern Brazil, which has the largest percentage of Black residents outside the African continent. The third author is from southeastern Brazil, a region with a significant percentage of White individuals. The second author is from the southern United States, is a native English speaker, and has practiced, taught, and conducted research with Black populations in the United States. These social markers shape how we do everyday life, being members of the Black community in our respective countries, belonging to an antiracist movement, and becoming transformative agents to change approaches to engaging with Black occupational therapy service recipients.

理解指导黑人职业治疗实践的理论和框架:范围审查。
重要性:在全球范围内,职业治疗专业在其治疗服务中忽视了解决反黑人种族主义问题。尽管近年来关于民族/种族问题的讨论在该领域有所增长,但很少有研究调查了为与黑人人群一起工作的职业治疗从业者提供实践信息的理论和方法框架。目的:描述和分析为黑人提供服务的职业治疗从业人员可用的理论和方法框架。数据来源:检索2013 - 2024年发表的英文和葡萄牙文文章,检索检索对象为MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、LILACS、SCIELO、Web of Science和Scopus。研究选择和数据收集:Arksey和O'Malley(2005)概述的范围审查程序以及范围审查系统审查和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)用于识别反映理论和方法框架的文章,这些框架指导了与黑人人群一起工作的职业治疗从业人员的实践。结果:48篇文章符合纳入标准,分为四个主题:人文社会科学:理论与框架;occupation-centered方法;通过集体职业、交叉性和将黑人认识论纳入职业治疗实践来解决系统性不平等问题;以及方法论方法。结论和相关性:研究结果表明,职业治疗从业者必须对黑人采取反种族主义的方法,并以反霸权和非殖民化框架为指导。需要更多的研究来调查指导黑人治疗实践的框架的有效性和局限性。简单的语言总结:这个范围审查询问反黑人种族主义在职业治疗实践和相关框架可用于与世界各地的黑人工作的职业治疗从业人员。作者指出了在实践和研究中仍然存在的差距,并提供了从反种族主义的角度解决这些人群的需求和要求的行动途径。立场声明:作者是黑人、顺性、异性恋、女性认同的职业治疗从业者和学术活动家,他们在职业治疗和职业科学中从事反种族主义、性别和残疾歧视的交叉研究和实践。第一和第三位作者生活在巴西的不同地区,说葡萄牙语。第一位作者来自巴西东北部的一个州,那里是非洲大陆以外黑人居民比例最大的州。第三位作者来自巴西东南部,一个白人占很大比例的地区。第二位作者来自美国南部,以英语为母语,曾在美国黑人群体中进行实践、教学和研究。这些社会标志塑造了我们的日常生活方式,作为各自国家黑人社区的成员,属于反种族主义运动,并成为改变与黑人职业治疗服务接受者接触方法的变革推动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信