Social interactions and loneliness in daily life: A study of younger adults and cognitively diverse older adults.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Tess Wild, Emily C Willroth, Tammy English
{"title":"Social interactions and loneliness in daily life: A study of younger adults and cognitively diverse older adults.","authors":"Tess Wild, Emily C Willroth, Tammy English","doi":"10.1037/dev0002069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeling lonely is a common experience across the lifespan and people's feelings of loneliness often do not correspond with their levels of social interaction in expected ways (i.e., social asymmetry). It is unclear, however, whether loneliness in daily life differs by age or cognitive status and how loneliness varies as a function of social interaction across age and cognitive status. The present research used experience sampling to investigate group differences in loneliness and social interaction in the daily lives of individuals (N = 219; Rangeage = 21-84; 57% women; 67% White), including younger adults (Mage = 27), cognitively unimpaired older adults (Mage = 75), and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; Mage = 77). Compared with older adults, younger adults reported being lonelier and their loneliness was more strongly tied to recent social interactions (i.e., greater reductions in loneliness vs. when no recent interaction). In contrast, relative to younger adults, cognitively unimpaired older adults demonstrated an attenuated negative relation between their social interactions and loneliness levels and no such association was present for older adults with MCI. Across groups loneliness was lower after social interactions that occurred face-to-face, but partner closeness primarily mattered for reduced loneliness in older adults with MCI. The findings suggest younger adults are particularly vulnerable to experiencing loneliness in their daily lives, and frequent face-to-face social interactions may serve as a buffer against loneliness. Although older adults may feel less lonely on average, older adults with MCI may be especially likely to experience social asymmetries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feeling lonely is a common experience across the lifespan and people's feelings of loneliness often do not correspond with their levels of social interaction in expected ways (i.e., social asymmetry). It is unclear, however, whether loneliness in daily life differs by age or cognitive status and how loneliness varies as a function of social interaction across age and cognitive status. The present research used experience sampling to investigate group differences in loneliness and social interaction in the daily lives of individuals (N = 219; Rangeage = 21-84; 57% women; 67% White), including younger adults (Mage = 27), cognitively unimpaired older adults (Mage = 75), and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; Mage = 77). Compared with older adults, younger adults reported being lonelier and their loneliness was more strongly tied to recent social interactions (i.e., greater reductions in loneliness vs. when no recent interaction). In contrast, relative to younger adults, cognitively unimpaired older adults demonstrated an attenuated negative relation between their social interactions and loneliness levels and no such association was present for older adults with MCI. Across groups loneliness was lower after social interactions that occurred face-to-face, but partner closeness primarily mattered for reduced loneliness in older adults with MCI. The findings suggest younger adults are particularly vulnerable to experiencing loneliness in their daily lives, and frequent face-to-face social interactions may serve as a buffer against loneliness. Although older adults may feel less lonely on average, older adults with MCI may be especially likely to experience social asymmetries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

日常生活中的社会互动和孤独:一项针对年轻人和认知多样化老年人的研究。
感到孤独是一生中常见的经历,人们的孤独感通常与他们预期的社会互动水平不一致(即社会不对称)。然而,日常生活中的孤独感是否因年龄或认知状态而异,以及孤独感如何随年龄和认知状态的社会互动而变化,目前尚不清楚。本研究采用经验抽样的方法调查了个体(N = 219;年龄范围= 21-84;57%女性;67%白人)在日常生活中孤独感和社会互动方面的群体差异,包括年轻人(Mage = 27)、认知功能未受损的老年人(Mage = 75)和轻度认知障碍的老年人(MCI; Mage = 77)。与老年人相比,年轻人报告说他们更孤独,他们的孤独感与最近的社交互动联系更紧密(即,孤独感比没有社交互动的人减少得更多)。相比之下,与年轻人相比,认知功能未受损的老年人在社交互动和孤独水平之间表现出减弱的负相关关系,而患有轻度认知障碍的老年人则没有这种关联。在面对面的社交互动后,各组的孤独感都有所降低,但伴侣的亲密关系对轻度认知障碍老年人的孤独感减少起着主要作用。研究结果表明,年轻人在日常生活中特别容易感到孤独,而频繁的面对面社交可能会缓冲孤独感。虽然老年人平均来说可能感觉不那么孤独,但患有轻度认知障碍的老年人可能特别容易经历社会不对称。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信