Kristi Baerg MacDonald, Karen A Patte, Scott T Leatherdale, Julie Aitken Schermer
{"title":"Trajectories of loneliness in Canadian adolescents over the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Kristi Baerg MacDonald, Karen A Patte, Scott T Leatherdale, Julie Aitken Schermer","doi":"10.1037/dev0002065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increases in adolescent loneliness were a significant concern during the lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use longitudinal survey data from the Cannabis Use, Obesity, Mental Health, Physical Activity, Alcohol Use, Smoking, and Sedentary Behavior study from 2017 to 2023 to assess whether increases in loneliness correspond to lockdowns, whether different cohorts differ in the trajectories of loneliness ratings and whether social support and relationships impact the course of loneliness throughout secondary school. We compared linear latent growth models and latent basis growth models of annual repeated measures of loneliness from three 4-year cohorts of Canadian high school students (<i>N</i> = 5,237, female = 3,166, 80.42% White). For the 2017-2021 cohort, a linear model fit best, while nonlinear models were the best fit for the 2018-2022 and 2019-2023 cohorts. Ratings of loneliness were highest at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic across all three cohorts and stabilized in the years following. Growth mixture models identified groups with differing trajectories of loneliness where lowest loneliness was associated with positive relationship quality of family and friends. Overall, the study demonstrated heterogeneity in loneliness trajectories across time between and within cohorts. The patterns were consistent with increases during COVID-19 lockdowns and a return to typical levels as social restrictions eased. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increases in adolescent loneliness were a significant concern during the lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use longitudinal survey data from the Cannabis Use, Obesity, Mental Health, Physical Activity, Alcohol Use, Smoking, and Sedentary Behavior study from 2017 to 2023 to assess whether increases in loneliness correspond to lockdowns, whether different cohorts differ in the trajectories of loneliness ratings and whether social support and relationships impact the course of loneliness throughout secondary school. We compared linear latent growth models and latent basis growth models of annual repeated measures of loneliness from three 4-year cohorts of Canadian high school students (N = 5,237, female = 3,166, 80.42% White). For the 2017-2021 cohort, a linear model fit best, while nonlinear models were the best fit for the 2018-2022 and 2019-2023 cohorts. Ratings of loneliness were highest at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic across all three cohorts and stabilized in the years following. Growth mixture models identified groups with differing trajectories of loneliness where lowest loneliness was associated with positive relationship quality of family and friends. Overall, the study demonstrated heterogeneity in loneliness trajectories across time between and within cohorts. The patterns were consistent with increases during COVID-19 lockdowns and a return to typical levels as social restrictions eased. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.