Evaluation of a telemedicine pilot project for hypertension in Korea: a nationwide real-world data study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jeong-Yeon Kim, Yeryeon Jung, Seongwoo Seo, Youseok Kim, Min Jung Ko, Hun-Sung Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of a telemedicine pilot project for hypertension in Korea: a nationwide real-world data study.","authors":"Jeong-Yeon Kim, Yeryeon Jung, Seongwoo Seo, Youseok Kim, Min Jung Ko, Hun-Sung Kim","doi":"10.4178/epih.e2025048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> A telemedicine pilot project has received temporary authorization in Korea. The clinical effectiveness of telemedicine is well established; however, ongoing research must assess medical utilization, sustainability, prescription continuity, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This study evaluated medical utilization, sustainability, prescription continuity, and safety before and after the implementation of a telemedicine pilot project between June 2022 and December 2023. Data were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), and participants were divided into those who received non-face-to-face hypertension treatment at least once and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> This study included 124,210 patients diagnosed with hypertension who received telemedicine (the Tele_G group) and 124,210 propensity score-matched control individuals. The difference-in-difference (DID) for medical utilization between the Tele_G and control groups was 0.10 (-0.03 vs. -0.12, p<0.001). The DID for the Modified Modified Continuity Index was -0.005 (-0.003 vs. 0.002, p<0.001), while that for Most Frequent Provider Continuity was -0.006 (-0.004 vs. 0.002, p<0.001). The DID for the prescription day rate was 0.41 (-0.61 vs. -1.02, p<0.001), and that for the appropriate prescription continuation rate was 0.52 (-1.23 vs. -1.75, p<0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Telemedicine did not fully achieve the same standard as face-to-face treatment for hypertension management; however, it showed comparable safety, suggesting potential as secondary care. As the first NHIS-based study on this topic in Korea, this research highlights the benefits of telemedicine when appropriately utilized for patients with hypertension. Nevertheless, due to limitations regarding long-term continuity and policy design, cautious interpretation is required, and further prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48543,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2025048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:  A telemedicine pilot project has received temporary authorization in Korea. The clinical effectiveness of telemedicine is well established; however, ongoing research must assess medical utilization, sustainability, prescription continuity, and safety.

Methods:  This study evaluated medical utilization, sustainability, prescription continuity, and safety before and after the implementation of a telemedicine pilot project between June 2022 and December 2023. Data were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS), and participants were divided into those who received non-face-to-face hypertension treatment at least once and those who did not.

Results:  This study included 124,210 patients diagnosed with hypertension who received telemedicine (the Tele_G group) and 124,210 propensity score-matched control individuals. The difference-in-difference (DID) for medical utilization between the Tele_G and control groups was 0.10 (-0.03 vs. -0.12, p<0.001). The DID for the Modified Modified Continuity Index was -0.005 (-0.003 vs. 0.002, p<0.001), while that for Most Frequent Provider Continuity was -0.006 (-0.004 vs. 0.002, p<0.001). The DID for the prescription day rate was 0.41 (-0.61 vs. -1.02, p<0.001), and that for the appropriate prescription continuation rate was 0.52 (-1.23 vs. -1.75, p<0.005).

Conclusion:  Telemedicine did not fully achieve the same standard as face-to-face treatment for hypertension management; however, it showed comparable safety, suggesting potential as secondary care. As the first NHIS-based study on this topic in Korea, this research highlights the benefits of telemedicine when appropriately utilized for patients with hypertension. Nevertheless, due to limitations regarding long-term continuity and policy design, cautious interpretation is required, and further prospective studies are warranted.

评价韩国高血压远程医疗试点项目:一项全国性的真实世界数据研究。
目标:远程医疗试点项目在韩国获得临时授权。远程医疗的临床效果是公认的;然而,正在进行的研究必须评估医疗利用、可持续性、处方连续性和安全性。方法:本研究评估了2022年6月至2023年12月实施远程医疗试点前后的医疗利用、可持续性、处方连续性和安全性。数据来自韩国国民健康保险公团(NHIS),参与者被分为至少接受过一次非面对面高血压治疗和没有接受治疗的两组。结果:本研究纳入了124,210例接受远程医疗的高血压患者(Tele_G组)和124,210例倾向评分匹配的对照组。Tele_G组与对照组在医疗利用方面的差异中差值(DID)为0.10 (-0.03 vs -0.12)。结论:远程医疗在高血压管理方面并没有完全达到面对面治疗的标准,但其安全性相当,具有作为二级保健的潜力。作为韩国关于这一主题的第一个基于nhis的研究,该研究强调了远程医疗在适当地用于高血压患者时的益处。然而,由于长期连续性和政策设计的局限性,需要谨慎解释,并需要进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Health
Epidemiology and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Health (epiH) is an electronic journal publishing papers in all areas of epidemiology and public health. It is indexed on PubMed Central and the scope is wide-ranging: including descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology; primary preventive measures; screening approaches and secondary prevention; clinical epidemiology; and all aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases prevention. The epiH publishes original research, and also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, cohort profiles and data profiles, epidemic and case investigations, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信