Failure to Re-identify and Manage Known Dementia Associated With Hospital Readmission and LOS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Kara Cappetta, Luise Lago, Jan Potter, Lyn Phillipson
{"title":"Failure to Re-identify and Manage Known Dementia Associated With Hospital Readmission and LOS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kara Cappetta, Luise Lago, Jan Potter, Lyn Phillipson","doi":"10.1177/07334648251368428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent to which known dementia is re-identified and managed during hospitalization and the impact of this on patient outcomes warrant investigation. Among 7,919 patients with an index admission coded with dementia between 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2015 in a regional health district in Australia, we examined total length of stay (LOS) and Difference from Expected LOS (using mixed linear regression and quantile regression), and 30-day readmission (using a generalized linear mixed model). In models adjusted for age, complexity, specialty, and discharge destination, uncoded stays had significantly shorter total LOS (β = -2.9, 95% CI: -3.5, -2.3) and Difference from Expected LOS (β = -5.2, 95% CI: -5.8, -4.6). Quantile regression results confirmed these findings but were smaller in effect size. People without dementia coded were 1.2 times more likely to be re-readmitted (95% CI: 1.1, 1.3) than when coded. Consistent re-identification and active management of known dementia is needed to improve long-term patient and health system outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648251368428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251368428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent to which known dementia is re-identified and managed during hospitalization and the impact of this on patient outcomes warrant investigation. Among 7,919 patients with an index admission coded with dementia between 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2015 in a regional health district in Australia, we examined total length of stay (LOS) and Difference from Expected LOS (using mixed linear regression and quantile regression), and 30-day readmission (using a generalized linear mixed model). In models adjusted for age, complexity, specialty, and discharge destination, uncoded stays had significantly shorter total LOS (β = -2.9, 95% CI: -3.5, -2.3) and Difference from Expected LOS (β = -5.2, 95% CI: -5.8, -4.6). Quantile regression results confirmed these findings but were smaller in effect size. People without dementia coded were 1.2 times more likely to be re-readmitted (95% CI: 1.1, 1.3) than when coded. Consistent re-identification and active management of known dementia is needed to improve long-term patient and health system outcomes.

未能重新识别和管理与医院再入院和LOS相关的已知痴呆:一项回顾性队列研究。
在住院期间重新识别和管理已知痴呆的程度及其对患者预后的影响值得调查。在澳大利亚某区域卫生区,2006年7月1日至2015年6月30日期间,7919名以痴呆为入院指标的患者中,我们检查了总住院时间(LOS)和与预期LOS的差异(使用混合线性回归和分位数回归),以及30天再入院(使用广义线性混合模型)。在对年龄、复杂性、专业和出院目的地进行调整的模型中,未编码住院的总LOS (β = -2.9, 95% CI: -3.5, -2.3)和预期LOS (β = -5.2, 95% CI: -5.8, -4.6)显著缩短。分位数回归结果证实了这些发现,但效应量较小。未编码痴呆的患者再次入院的可能性是编码痴呆患者的1.2倍(95% CI: 1.1, 1.3)。为改善患者和卫生系统的长期结果,需要对已知的痴呆症进行持续的重新识别和积极管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信