Physicians' information-seeking, appraising, and clinical decision-making practices for drug prescriptions: an exploratory study.

IF 5.1 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Journal of the Medical Library Association Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.5195/jmla.2025.2082
Akhi Nath, Julien Meyer, Mathieu Templier
{"title":"Physicians' information-seeking, appraising, and clinical decision-making practices for drug prescriptions: an exploratory study.","authors":"Akhi Nath, Julien Meyer, Mathieu Templier","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to understand the process of physicians' evidence-based clinical decision-making for new drug prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic coding was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several findings emerged. First, point-of-care information seeking focuses more on accessible and easy-to-use sources, such as medical websites, while out-of-practice searches encompass broader sources such as printed sources and extended networks. Medical websites are becoming preferred sources of information. Second, critical appraisal of information is performed passively by using pre-appraised information sources and referring to professional networks. Third, professional networks (i.e., specialists and senior colleagues) remain essential throughout the process and are pivotal for the decision to change prescription practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical information systems that facilitate immediate access to summarized reliable evidence and feature real-time connectivity to the communities of practice can be an effective strategy for improving physicians' evidence-based practice for new drug prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"113 3","pages":"224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.2082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to understand the process of physicians' evidence-based clinical decision-making for new drug prescriptions.

Methods: Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic coding was used for data analysis.

Results: Several findings emerged. First, point-of-care information seeking focuses more on accessible and easy-to-use sources, such as medical websites, while out-of-practice searches encompass broader sources such as printed sources and extended networks. Medical websites are becoming preferred sources of information. Second, critical appraisal of information is performed passively by using pre-appraised information sources and referring to professional networks. Third, professional networks (i.e., specialists and senior colleagues) remain essential throughout the process and are pivotal for the decision to change prescription practices.

Conclusions: Medical information systems that facilitate immediate access to summarized reliable evidence and feature real-time connectivity to the communities of practice can be an effective strategy for improving physicians' evidence-based practice for new drug prescriptions.

Abstract Image

医生对药物处方的信息寻求、评价和临床决策实践:一项探索性研究。
目的:了解医师对新药处方的循证临床决策过程。方法:进行11次半结构化访谈,采用主题编码进行数据分析。结果:出现了几个发现。首先,医疗点信息搜索更多地侧重于可访问和易于使用的来源,如医疗网站,而过时的搜索包括更广泛的来源,如印刷来源和扩展网络。医疗网站正成为人们首选的信息来源。第二,对信息的批判性评价是被动地通过使用预评价的信息源和参考专业网络来进行的。第三,专业网络(即专家和资深同事)在整个过程中仍然至关重要,对改变处方做法的决定至关重要。结论:促进即时获取总结的可靠证据并具有与实践社区实时连接的医疗信息系统可以成为提高医生对新药处方的循证实践的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信