The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire (O-PDQ): assessing paranoia-related safety-seeking behaviours.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sinead Lambe, Sophie Mulhall, Jessica Bird, Kira Williams, Joanna Mitchell, Mollie Roddan, Glory Sokunle, Laina Rosebrock, Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite
{"title":"The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire (O-PDQ): assessing paranoia-related safety-seeking behaviours.","authors":"Sinead Lambe, Sophie Mulhall, Jessica Bird, Kira Williams, Joanna Mitchell, Mollie Roddan, Glory Sokunle, Laina Rosebrock, Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite","doi":"10.1017/S1352465825100994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Defence behaviours - actions carried out to reduce perceived threat - are an important maintenance factor for persecutory delusions. Avoidance of feared situations and subtle in-situation behaviours reduce opportunities for new learning and are erroneously credited for the non-occurrence of harm; hence inaccurate fears are maintained. In contrast, exposure to feared situations whilst dropping defence behaviours - a key technique of cognitive therapy for paranoia - allows the discovery of new information concerning safety, thereby reducing persecutory delusions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to develop for use in research and clinical practice a self-report assessment of paranoia-related defence behaviours.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 64-item pool was developed from interviews with 106 patients with persecutory delusions, and completed by 53 patients with persecutory delusions, 592 people with elevated paranoia, and 2108 people with low paranoia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to derive the measure. Reliability and validity were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two scales were developed: a 12-item avoidance scale and a 20-item in-situation defences scale. The avoidance scale had three factors (indoor spaces, outdoor spaces, and interactions) with an excellent model fit (CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.027). The in-situation defences scale had a 5-factor model (maintaining safety at home, mitigating risk, staying vigilant, preparing for escape, and keeping a low profile) with a good fit (CFI=0.95, TLI=0.94, RMSEA=0.046, SRMR=0.039). Both scales demonstrated good internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire is a psychometrically robust scale that can assess a key factor in the maintenance of persecutory delusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465825100994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Defence behaviours - actions carried out to reduce perceived threat - are an important maintenance factor for persecutory delusions. Avoidance of feared situations and subtle in-situation behaviours reduce opportunities for new learning and are erroneously credited for the non-occurrence of harm; hence inaccurate fears are maintained. In contrast, exposure to feared situations whilst dropping defence behaviours - a key technique of cognitive therapy for paranoia - allows the discovery of new information concerning safety, thereby reducing persecutory delusions.

Aim: We aimed to develop for use in research and clinical practice a self-report assessment of paranoia-related defence behaviours.

Method: A 64-item pool was developed from interviews with 106 patients with persecutory delusions, and completed by 53 patients with persecutory delusions, 592 people with elevated paranoia, and 2108 people with low paranoia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to derive the measure. Reliability and validity were assessed.

Results: Two scales were developed: a 12-item avoidance scale and a 20-item in-situation defences scale. The avoidance scale had three factors (indoor spaces, outdoor spaces, and interactions) with an excellent model fit (CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.027). The in-situation defences scale had a 5-factor model (maintaining safety at home, mitigating risk, staying vigilant, preparing for escape, and keeping a low profile) with a good fit (CFI=0.95, TLI=0.94, RMSEA=0.046, SRMR=0.039). Both scales demonstrated good internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

Conclusions: The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire is a psychometrically robust scale that can assess a key factor in the maintenance of persecutory delusions.

牛津偏执狂防御行为问卷(O-PDQ):评估偏执狂相关的寻求安全行为。
背景:防御行为——为减少感知到的威胁而采取的行动——是受迫害妄想的重要维持因素。避免恐惧情境和微妙的情境行为减少了新学习的机会,并被错误地认为是不发生伤害的原因;因此,不准确的恐惧得以维持。相比之下,暴露在令人恐惧的情况下,同时放弃防御行为——偏执认知疗法的一项关键技术——允许发现有关安全的新信息,从而减少受迫害的妄想。目的:我们的目的是开发用于研究和临床实践的妄想症相关防御行为的自我报告评估。方法:通过对106例妄想症患者的访谈,编制了一个64项问卷,其中妄想症患者53例,妄想症高发患者592例,妄想症低发患者2108例。探索性和验证性因素分析用于推导测量。评估信度和效度。结果:编制了12项回避量表和20项情境防御量表。回避量表有室内空间、室外空间和相互作用三个因素,模型拟合良好(CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.027)。情境防御量表的5因素模型(保持居家安全、降低风险、保持警惕、准备逃跑、保持低调)拟合良好(CFI=0.95, TLI=0.94, RMSEA=0.046, SRMR=0.039)。两份量表均具有良好的内部信度、重测信度和构念效度。结论:牛津妄想症防御行为问卷是一种心理测量学上可靠的量表,可以评估被害妄想维持的一个关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信