Inhaled antibiotics and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: Trying to solve the puzzle.

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_608_24
Nithiyanandan Ravi
{"title":"Inhaled antibiotics and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: Trying to solve the puzzle.","authors":"Nithiyanandan Ravi","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_608_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway disease with recurrent exacerbations and hospitalisations. No inhaled antibiotic has shown consistently beneficial effects in trials. This review analyses the evidence on inhaled antibiotics in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB), identifies patient traits for their use, and highlights research gaps. A PubMed search for \"Inhaled antibiotics AND bronchiectasis\" identified five inhaled antibiotics studied in randomised controlled trials (RCTs): aztreonam, tobramycin, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin. Inhaled antibiotics reduced exacerbation frequency, sputum bacterial density, and increased bacterial eradication but did not improve lung function. They also increased antimicrobial resistance, with aztreonam and aminoglycosides having higher discontinuation rates due to side effects. Increased sputum bacterial density (>107 colony forming units/g), increased exacerbation frequency (≥4) at baseline, and increased sputum volume and/or purulence at baseline are some of identifiable traits associated with benefit from inhaled antibiotics. Inhaled antibiotics may aid in eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa after first isolation in NCFB, but their role in acute exacerbations requires further research. There are no direct RCTs comparing different delivery systems, antibiotics, and regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 5","pages":"443-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_608_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway disease with recurrent exacerbations and hospitalisations. No inhaled antibiotic has shown consistently beneficial effects in trials. This review analyses the evidence on inhaled antibiotics in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB), identifies patient traits for their use, and highlights research gaps. A PubMed search for "Inhaled antibiotics AND bronchiectasis" identified five inhaled antibiotics studied in randomised controlled trials (RCTs): aztreonam, tobramycin, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin. Inhaled antibiotics reduced exacerbation frequency, sputum bacterial density, and increased bacterial eradication but did not improve lung function. They also increased antimicrobial resistance, with aztreonam and aminoglycosides having higher discontinuation rates due to side effects. Increased sputum bacterial density (>107 colony forming units/g), increased exacerbation frequency (≥4) at baseline, and increased sputum volume and/or purulence at baseline are some of identifiable traits associated with benefit from inhaled antibiotics. Inhaled antibiotics may aid in eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa after first isolation in NCFB, but their role in acute exacerbations requires further research. There are no direct RCTs comparing different delivery systems, antibiotics, and regimens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

吸入抗生素和非囊性纤维化支气管扩张:试图解决这个难题。
支气管扩张是一种慢性气道疾病,可反复发作和住院。在试验中,没有吸入抗生素显示出持续的有益效果。本综述分析了吸入抗生素治疗非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症(NCFB)的证据,确定了使用抗生素的患者特征,并强调了研究空白。PubMed检索“吸入抗生素和支气管扩张”,确定了随机对照试验(rct)中研究的五种吸入抗生素:阿唑南、妥布霉素、庆大霉素、环丙沙星和粘菌素。吸入抗生素降低了加重频率、痰细菌密度和细菌根除,但没有改善肺功能。它们还增加了抗菌素耐药性,由于副作用,氨曲南和氨基糖苷类药物的停药率更高。痰中细菌密度增加(基线时达到107菌落形成单位/g),加重频率增加(≥4),痰量和/或脓量增加(基线时)是吸入抗生素获益的一些可识别特征。吸入抗生素可能有助于NCFB首次分离后的铜绿假单胞菌的根除,但其在急性加重中的作用需要进一步研究。没有比较不同给药系统、抗生素和治疗方案的直接随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信