Safety and efficacy of the pipeline vantage flow diverter for the treatment of saccular aneurysms in the posterior cerebral circulation.

IF 0.8 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Omar Abu-Fares, Antonis Adamou, Peter Raab, Heinrich Lanfermann, Alexander Sirakov, Marie Middendorff, Harold F Hounchonou, Joachim K Krauss, Shadi Al-Afif
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the pipeline vantage flow diverter for the treatment of saccular aneurysms in the posterior cerebral circulation.","authors":"Omar Abu-Fares, Antonis Adamou, Peter Raab, Heinrich Lanfermann, Alexander Sirakov, Marie Middendorff, Harold F Hounchonou, Joachim K Krauss, Shadi Al-Afif","doi":"10.1177/19714009251373070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPosterior circulation aneurysms are particularly challenging to treat due to their anatomical complexity and the high perforator density within this region. The pipeline vantage flow diverter (PVFD) has shown promising results in treating anterior circulation aneurysms. However, its efficacy and safety in treating posterior circulation saccular aneurysms are not well investigated.MethodsSingle-center study reviewed patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the PVFD between September 2021 and March 2024. Patients and aneurysm characteristics, clinical results, and radiological results were documented.Results22 patients harboring 24 aneurysms were identified. All aneurysms had a saccular morphology. Complications included ischemic events in two patients (8.3%), one leading to mRS deterioration from 0 to 3. One cerebral hemorrhage leading to mRS shift from 0 to 1 was also documented. At the latest imaging follow-up available (median 14.3 months), complete aneurysm occlusion (Class I, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) was achieved in 50% of the cases, residual neck (Class II) in 41.7%, and residual aneurysm (Class III) in 8.3%. Basilar bifurcation aneurysms had lower complete occlusion rates (RROC I: 33.3%) and higher complication rates (16.7% with mRS shift) compared to other locations. In-stent stenosis was rare (4.5%). A limitation of the study is the retrospective, single-center study design.ConclusionThe PVFD demonstrates high occlusion rates and a favorable safety profile in the treatment of saccular aneurysms in the posterior circulation. However, treatment of basilar bifurcation aneurysms with the PVFD remains challenging due to the complex anatomy and high-flow dynamics in this location.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251373070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251373070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPosterior circulation aneurysms are particularly challenging to treat due to their anatomical complexity and the high perforator density within this region. The pipeline vantage flow diverter (PVFD) has shown promising results in treating anterior circulation aneurysms. However, its efficacy and safety in treating posterior circulation saccular aneurysms are not well investigated.MethodsSingle-center study reviewed patients with posterior circulation aneurysms treated with the PVFD between September 2021 and March 2024. Patients and aneurysm characteristics, clinical results, and radiological results were documented.Results22 patients harboring 24 aneurysms were identified. All aneurysms had a saccular morphology. Complications included ischemic events in two patients (8.3%), one leading to mRS deterioration from 0 to 3. One cerebral hemorrhage leading to mRS shift from 0 to 1 was also documented. At the latest imaging follow-up available (median 14.3 months), complete aneurysm occlusion (Class I, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) was achieved in 50% of the cases, residual neck (Class II) in 41.7%, and residual aneurysm (Class III) in 8.3%. Basilar bifurcation aneurysms had lower complete occlusion rates (RROC I: 33.3%) and higher complication rates (16.7% with mRS shift) compared to other locations. In-stent stenosis was rare (4.5%). A limitation of the study is the retrospective, single-center study design.ConclusionThe PVFD demonstrates high occlusion rates and a favorable safety profile in the treatment of saccular aneurysms in the posterior circulation. However, treatment of basilar bifurcation aneurysms with the PVFD remains challenging due to the complex anatomy and high-flow dynamics in this location.

管道优势分流器治疗脑后循环囊状动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。
后循环动脉瘤由于其解剖复杂性和该区域的高穿支密度,治疗尤其具有挑战性。管道优势分流器(PVFD)在治疗前循环动脉瘤中显示出良好的效果。然而,其治疗后循环囊状动脉瘤的有效性和安全性尚未得到很好的研究。方法对2021年9月至2024年3月间接受PVFD治疗的后循环动脉瘤患者进行单中心研究。记录了患者和动脉瘤的特征、临床结果和影像学结果。结果22例患者共发现24个动脉瘤。所有动脉瘤均呈囊状形态。并发症包括2例(8.3%)的缺血性事件,1例导致mRS从0到3恶化。一例脑出血导致mRS从0变为1也有记录。在最新的影像学随访中(中位14.3个月),50%的病例实现了完全的动脉瘤闭塞(I类,Raymond-Roy闭塞分类(RROC)), 41.7%的病例实现了颈部残留(II类),8.3%的病例实现了动脉瘤残留(III类)。与其他位置相比,基底动脉分叉动脉瘤的完全闭塞率较低(RROC I: 33.3%),并发症发生率较高(伴mRS移位的16.7%)。支架内狭窄罕见(4.5%)。该研究的一个局限性是回顾性、单中心研究设计。结论PVFD治疗后循环囊状动脉瘤具有较高的闭塞率和良好的安全性。然而,由于该部位复杂的解剖结构和高血流动力学,PVFD治疗基底动脉分叉动脉瘤仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信