Convergent Validity for the Music in Everyday Life Assessment Tool.

IF 0.8 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Gustavo Schulz Gattino, Grace Thompson, Cochavit Elefant, John A Carpente, Tali Gottfried
{"title":"Convergent Validity for the Music in Everyday Life Assessment Tool.","authors":"Gustavo Schulz Gattino, Grace Thompson, Cochavit Elefant, John A Carpente, Tali Gottfried","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More assessments in the area of music therapy and autism are needed to determine whether a change in the use of music in everyday life has occurred and demonstrate psychometric validity. This study explores the convergent validity of the Music in Everyday Life (MEL) assessment by considering the relationships between the scores of the 2 MEL subscales (Joint Activities using Music [MEL-JAM] and Routine Activities using Music [MEL-RAM]), the scores of the 5 subscales of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the 5 subscales of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Data from 106 participants across four countries were analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation inferential test. The MEL subscales and ADOS scores were positively correlated, ranging from low to moderate. However, these correlations may need to be more clinically meaningful, given the heterogeneity between the assessment tools. No correlations were found for the MEL subscales and the SRS. Future studies should consider whether diagnostic assessments that measure symptom severity are relevant in establishing the validity of music therapy assessments. Conducting other forms of validity for the MEL assessment is warranted, such as factor analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thaf013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More assessments in the area of music therapy and autism are needed to determine whether a change in the use of music in everyday life has occurred and demonstrate psychometric validity. This study explores the convergent validity of the Music in Everyday Life (MEL) assessment by considering the relationships between the scores of the 2 MEL subscales (Joint Activities using Music [MEL-JAM] and Routine Activities using Music [MEL-RAM]), the scores of the 5 subscales of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the 5 subscales of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Data from 106 participants across four countries were analyzed using the Spearman Rank Correlation inferential test. The MEL subscales and ADOS scores were positively correlated, ranging from low to moderate. However, these correlations may need to be more clinically meaningful, given the heterogeneity between the assessment tools. No correlations were found for the MEL subscales and the SRS. Future studies should consider whether diagnostic assessments that measure symptom severity are relevant in establishing the validity of music therapy assessments. Conducting other forms of validity for the MEL assessment is warranted, such as factor analysis.

日常生活中的音乐评估工具的收敛效度。
需要对音乐治疗和自闭症领域进行更多的评估,以确定日常生活中音乐使用的变化是否已经发生,并证明心理测量的有效性。本研究通过考虑日常生活中的音乐(MEL) 2个分量表(音乐联合活动[MEL- jam]和日常生活中的音乐活动[MEL- ram])、自闭症诊断观察表(ADOS) 5个分量表和社会反应量表(SRS) 5个分量表的得分之间的关系,探讨了日常生活中的音乐(MEL)评估的收敛效度。来自四个国家106名参与者的数据使用斯皮尔曼秩相关推理检验进行了分析。MEL分量表与ADOS得分呈低到中正相关。然而,考虑到评估工具之间的异质性,这些相关性可能需要更具临床意义。MEL分量表与SRS没有相关性。未来的研究应考虑测量症状严重程度的诊断评估是否与建立音乐治疗评估的有效性相关。对MEL评估进行其他形式的效度评估是必要的,例如因素分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信