Evaluating a toolkit for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities: An exploration of implementation outcomes within intellectual disability social care services.
Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne
{"title":"Evaluating a toolkit for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities: An exploration of implementation outcomes within intellectual disability social care services.","authors":"Andrea Bruun, Amanda Cresswell, David Jeffrey, Leon Jordan, Richard Keagan-Bull, Jo Giles, Faye Gardiner, Meg Wilding, Nicola Payne, Sarah Swindells, Sarah L Gibson, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne","doi":"10.1177/17446295251367687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251367687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251367687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study used qualitative surveys and focus groups to evaluate the implementation of an end-of-life care planning toolkit within intellectual disability social care services, by exploring whether it is beneficial and workable in this setting. Participants were staff trialling the toolkit and submitting feedback forms. Focus groups with support staff and service managers were also conducted. Feedback forms and focus group transcripts were coded using a modified framework approach. Data and analyses were discussed within the team (including researchers with intellectual disabilities). Thirty-four participants submitted 44 feedback forms. Two focus groups with seven participants were held. Participants found the toolkit approach and resources acceptable and appropriate, prompting positive eye-opening conversations. There were significant adoption and feasibility implementation challenges such as printing the resources, lack of time, and the sensitive end-of-life topic. Exploration of how to overcome these challenges is needed to successfully implement the toolkit in social care services.
期刊介绍:
The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.