Gender differences in face pareidolia: The effect of cognitive style and judgment criteria.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695251364206
Hao Wang, Zhigang Yang
{"title":"Gender differences in face pareidolia: The effect of cognitive style and judgment criteria.","authors":"Hao Wang, Zhigang Yang","doi":"10.1177/20416695251364206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face pareidolia refers to perceiving facial features on inanimate objects. Previous studies have identified gender differences in pareidolia, but the factors behind these differences remain unclear. This study examined potential influences, including task requirement, low-frequency information encoding ability, and cognitive style. University student participants reported what they saw in face-like object images and rated their face-likeness. A delayed matching task with blurred faces assessed encoding ability, and the Navon task examined cognitive style. Results showed that gender differences were influenced by task demands: women were more likely than men to perceive faces in objects, and this was not related to facial configuration processing. Additionally, a global processing tendency predicted higher pareidolia in women but not in men. Our findings suggest that gender differences in pareidolia are shaped by judgment criteria, with women adopting more relaxed criteria. This research contributes to understanding gender differences in social cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"16 4","pages":"20416695251364206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251364206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Face pareidolia refers to perceiving facial features on inanimate objects. Previous studies have identified gender differences in pareidolia, but the factors behind these differences remain unclear. This study examined potential influences, including task requirement, low-frequency information encoding ability, and cognitive style. University student participants reported what they saw in face-like object images and rated their face-likeness. A delayed matching task with blurred faces assessed encoding ability, and the Navon task examined cognitive style. Results showed that gender differences were influenced by task demands: women were more likely than men to perceive faces in objects, and this was not related to facial configuration processing. Additionally, a global processing tendency predicted higher pareidolia in women but not in men. Our findings suggest that gender differences in pareidolia are shaped by judgment criteria, with women adopting more relaxed criteria. This research contributes to understanding gender differences in social cognition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

面孔空想性视的性别差异:认知方式和判断标准的影响。
面部空想性视错觉是指从无生命物体上感知面部特征。先前的研究已经确定了空想性视的性别差异,但这些差异背后的因素尚不清楚。本研究考察了潜在的影响因素,包括任务要求、低频信息编码能力和认知风格。大学生参与者报告了他们在类似人脸的物体图像中看到的东西,并对它们的面部相似度进行了评分。一个带有模糊面孔的延迟匹配任务评估了编码能力,而Navon任务测试了认知风格。结果表明,性别差异受到任务需求的影响:女性比男性更有可能在物体中感知人脸,而这与面部配置处理无关。此外,全球加工倾向预测女性有更高的空想性视错觉,而男性没有。我们的研究结果表明,幻想性视错觉的性别差异是由判断标准决定的,女性采用更宽松的标准。本研究有助于理解社会认知中的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信