Effect of a nursing instructional module on the acute side effects of double-J stent removal for ureterolithiasis patients: a quasi-experimental study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Rasha Fathy Dawood, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Shadaid Alanezi, Emad Abdel Gawad Ali Rabie
{"title":"Effect of a nursing instructional module on the acute side effects of double-J stent removal for ureterolithiasis patients: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Rasha Fathy Dawood, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Shadaid Alanezi, Emad Abdel Gawad Ali Rabie","doi":"10.1177/17449871251328928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The double-J (DJ) stent is an indispensable device in urology, a rudimentary part of numerous procedures and a management tool for patients with ureteric calculi. However, some issues connected to its usage still arise. The issues include patient discomfort, urinary symptoms (such as urgency and frequency), hematuria, infection, stent migration, and encrustation with prolonged indwelling time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to determine whether awhether a nursing instructional module has a positive effect on the acute side effects of DJ stent removal for ureterolithiasis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a quasi-experimental research design on 50 patients (25 in the study group, with a nursing instuctional model, and 25 in the control group, with support as usual). The patient's knowledge about ureteral stones, the ureteral DJ stent assessment chart and the Ureteral Stent Discomfort tools were used to measure the patient's knowledge about ureteral stones and appraise the ureteral stent discomfort and acute side effects after removal in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studied patients were males (64.0, 56.0%) and married (80.0, 76.0%). There was a 100% satisfactory knowledge level for the study group and highly statistically significant differences in all domains of the ureteral stent discomfort test of urinary symptoms among ureterolithiasis patients after the nursing instructional module implementation for the studied patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the nursing instructional module effectively refined patients' knowledge and reduced ureteral stent discomfort and acute side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871251328928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251328928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The double-J (DJ) stent is an indispensable device in urology, a rudimentary part of numerous procedures and a management tool for patients with ureteric calculi. However, some issues connected to its usage still arise. The issues include patient discomfort, urinary symptoms (such as urgency and frequency), hematuria, infection, stent migration, and encrustation with prolonged indwelling time.

Aim: The study aims to determine whether awhether a nursing instructional module has a positive effect on the acute side effects of DJ stent removal for ureterolithiasis patients.

Methods: The study employed a quasi-experimental research design on 50 patients (25 in the study group, with a nursing instuctional model, and 25 in the control group, with support as usual). The patient's knowledge about ureteral stones, the ureteral DJ stent assessment chart and the Ureteral Stent Discomfort tools were used to measure the patient's knowledge about ureteral stones and appraise the ureteral stent discomfort and acute side effects after removal in the two groups.

Results: Most studied patients were males (64.0, 56.0%) and married (80.0, 76.0%). There was a 100% satisfactory knowledge level for the study group and highly statistically significant differences in all domains of the ureteral stent discomfort test of urinary symptoms among ureterolithiasis patients after the nursing instructional module implementation for the studied patients.

Conclusion: Implementing the nursing instructional module effectively refined patients' knowledge and reduced ureteral stent discomfort and acute side effects.

护理教学模块对输尿管结石患者双j型支架取出急性副反应的影响:一项准实验研究。
背景:双j (DJ)支架是泌尿外科中不可缺少的设备,是许多手术的基本组成部分,也是输尿管结石患者的治疗工具。然而,与它的使用有关的一些问题仍然出现。这些问题包括患者不适、泌尿系统症状(如尿急和尿频)、血尿、感染、支架移位和留置时间延长导致的结痂。目的:本研究旨在确定护理教学模块是否对输尿管结石患者DJ支架置入术急性副反应有积极影响。方法:采用准实验研究设计,对50例患者进行研究,其中研究组25例,采用护理机构模式,对照组25例,照旧支持。采用患者输尿管结石知识知晓率、输尿管DJ支架评估表、输尿管支架不适工具测量患者输尿管结石知识知晓率,评价两组患者输尿管支架不适及取出后急性副作用。结果:患者以男性(64.0,56.0%)和已婚(80.0,76.0%)居多。在对研究患者实施护理教学模块后,研究组的知识水平达到100%满意,输尿管结石患者尿路症状输尿管支架不适测试各领域差异具有高度统计学意义。结论:实施护理教学模块有效地完善了患者的知识,减少了输尿管支架的不适感和急性副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信