Educational interventions on falls and fracture prevention in community dwelling older adults: a scoping review.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hiromi Matsumoto, Yuki Kitsuda, Takashi Wada
{"title":"Educational interventions on falls and fracture prevention in community dwelling older adults: a scoping review.","authors":"Hiromi Matsumoto, Yuki Kitsuda, Takashi Wada","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2551964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the content, duration, main outcomes, and benefits of educational interventions for fracture and fall prevention in community-dwelling older adults. Following JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane, JMED Plus J, EMBASE, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi for studies published in English and Japanese over the past ten years. Eligible studies included RCTs, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews. Twenty-eight studies were analyzed, with interventions delivered via lectures, personalized guidance, group discussions, peer education, and online platforms. Durations ranged from single sessions (30-90 min) to multi-week programs (1-12 weeks). While most studies improved fall prevention knowledge and behaviors, few assessed bone mineral density, and no significant changes were observed. Support from professionals, group discussion among participants, and peer educators may play a crucial role in the effectiveness of educational interventions. While many studies have implemented one-time lectures or training sessions, their long-term effects remain uncertain. Future research should focus on standardizing assessment methods, determining the optimal intervention duration, and integrating education with physical exercise and medical treatment to develop sustainable, evidence-based prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2551964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the content, duration, main outcomes, and benefits of educational interventions for fracture and fall prevention in community-dwelling older adults. Following JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane, JMED Plus J, EMBASE, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi for studies published in English and Japanese over the past ten years. Eligible studies included RCTs, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews. Twenty-eight studies were analyzed, with interventions delivered via lectures, personalized guidance, group discussions, peer education, and online platforms. Durations ranged from single sessions (30-90 min) to multi-week programs (1-12 weeks). While most studies improved fall prevention knowledge and behaviors, few assessed bone mineral density, and no significant changes were observed. Support from professionals, group discussion among participants, and peer educators may play a crucial role in the effectiveness of educational interventions. While many studies have implemented one-time lectures or training sessions, their long-term effects remain uncertain. Future research should focus on standardizing assessment methods, determining the optimal intervention duration, and integrating education with physical exercise and medical treatment to develop sustainable, evidence-based prevention programs.

社区老年人跌倒和骨折预防的教育干预:范围综述。
本综述旨在确定和总结社区老年人骨折和跌倒预防教育干预的内容、持续时间、主要结果和益处。根据JBI方法和PRISMA指南,我们在MEDLINE、Cochrane、JMED Plus J、EMBASE和Igaku Chuo Zasshi中对过去十年中以英语和日语发表的研究进行了全面的检索。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、准实验研究、观察性研究和系统评价。对28项研究进行了分析,干预措施包括讲座、个性化指导、小组讨论、同伴教育和在线平台。持续时间从单次(30-90分钟)到多周(1-12周)不等。虽然大多数研究提高了预防跌倒的知识和行为,但很少评估骨矿物质密度,并且没有观察到明显的变化。来自专业人士的支持、参与者之间的小组讨论和同伴教育者可能在教育干预的有效性中起着至关重要的作用。虽然许多研究实施了一次性讲座或培训课程,但其长期效果仍不确定。未来的研究应侧重于规范评估方法,确定最佳干预时间,并将教育与体育锻炼和医疗相结合,以制定可持续的、循证的预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信