Support of Underrepresented and Early-Stage Faculty at a Research Center for Minority Institutions: A Social Network Analysis of Research Productivity over a Five-Year Period.

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Heidi A Wayment, Kelly A Laurila, Julie A Baldwin
{"title":"Support of Underrepresented and Early-Stage Faculty at a Research Center for Minority Institutions: A Social Network Analysis of Research Productivity over a Five-Year Period.","authors":"Heidi A Wayment, Kelly A Laurila, Julie A Baldwin","doi":"10.1007/s10755-025-09794-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes how an innovative form of support strengthened diversity goals in an institution of higher learning. The Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative (SHERC) at Northern Arizona University recently completed its first funding cycle supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. This study examines progress on two of SHERC's principal goals: support the expansion of health equity research produced by SHERC-affiliated faculty and advance early-stage investigators (ESI) and underrepresented (UR) faculty research productivity. SHERC-affiliated faculty publications are described and the focus of a series of social network analyses (SNA). SHERC-affiliated faculty had access to an array of professional development opportunities. The number of supported faculty increased from 32 to 100 with a growing percentage of ESI and UR faculty. The number of UR and ESI faculty authors increased most rapidly over time. ESI and UR SHERC-affiliated faculty were co-authors in 72% and 45%, respectively, of the 139 total publications in the 5-year publication record. SNA centrality metrics revealed the important influence of ESI and UR faculty in the demonstrated increases in research publications over time. The increase of health-equity related research publications and concomitant expansion of ESI and UR faculty participation in these efforts can be facilitated by coordinated types of support offered by faculty development programs such as SHERC. The results from this study reinforce the importance of networks in organizational change efforts at institutions of higher learning seeking to build research capacity and increase scientific and community impact by advancing workforce diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47065,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09794-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes how an innovative form of support strengthened diversity goals in an institution of higher learning. The Southwest Health Equity Research Collaborative (SHERC) at Northern Arizona University recently completed its first funding cycle supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. This study examines progress on two of SHERC's principal goals: support the expansion of health equity research produced by SHERC-affiliated faculty and advance early-stage investigators (ESI) and underrepresented (UR) faculty research productivity. SHERC-affiliated faculty publications are described and the focus of a series of social network analyses (SNA). SHERC-affiliated faculty had access to an array of professional development opportunities. The number of supported faculty increased from 32 to 100 with a growing percentage of ESI and UR faculty. The number of UR and ESI faculty authors increased most rapidly over time. ESI and UR SHERC-affiliated faculty were co-authors in 72% and 45%, respectively, of the 139 total publications in the 5-year publication record. SNA centrality metrics revealed the important influence of ESI and UR faculty in the demonstrated increases in research publications over time. The increase of health-equity related research publications and concomitant expansion of ESI and UR faculty participation in these efforts can be facilitated by coordinated types of support offered by faculty development programs such as SHERC. The results from this study reinforce the importance of networks in organizational change efforts at institutions of higher learning seeking to build research capacity and increase scientific and community impact by advancing workforce diversity.

少数民族机构研究中心对代表性不足和早期教师的支持:五年来研究生产力的社会网络分析。
本研究描述了一种创新的支持形式如何加强高等院校的多样性目标。北亚利桑那大学的西南健康公平研究合作组织(SHERC)最近完成了由国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所支持的第一个资助周期。本研究考察了SHERC的两个主要目标的进展情况:支持SHERC附属教师开展的卫生公平研究的扩展,提高早期研究人员(ESI)和代表性不足(UR)教师的研究生产力。sherc附属的教师出版物被描述和一系列社会网络分析(SNA)的焦点。sherc下属的教师有机会获得一系列的专业发展机会。支持教师的数量从32名增加到100名,ESI和UR教师的比例越来越高。随着时间的推移,UR和ESI教师作者的数量增长最快。在5年发表记录的139篇论文中,ESI和UR sherc附属教师分别是72%和45%的共同作者。SNA中心性指标揭示了ESI和UR教师对研究出版物数量随时间增长的重要影响。健康公平相关研究出版物的增加以及ESI和UR教师参与这些努力的扩大可以通过教师发展计划(如SHERC)提供的协调类型的支持来促进。本研究的结果强化了网络在高等院校组织变革努力中的重要性,这些高等院校寻求通过促进劳动力多样性来建立研究能力并增加科学和社区影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovative Higher Education
Innovative Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Innovative Higher Education is a refereed scholarly journal that strives to package fresh ideas in higher education in a straightforward and readable fashion. The four main purposes of Innovative Higher Education are: (1) to present descriptions and evaluations of current innovations and provocative new ideas with relevance for action beyond the immediate context in higher education; (2) to focus on the effect of such innovations on teaching and students; (3) to be open to diverse forms of scholarship and research methods by maintaining flexibility in the selection of topics deemed appropriate for the journal; and (4) to strike a balance between practice and theory by presenting manuscripts in a readable and scholarly manner to both faculty and administrators in the academic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信