Feasibility study of a home-based sensory training system (STS) device for type 1 complex regional pain syndrome in England: Lessons learnt.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jessica Coggins, Sharon Grieve, Lisa Buckle, Darren Hart, Alison Llewellyn, Mark Palmer, Moniek Wittens, Candida McCabe
{"title":"Feasibility study of a home-based sensory training system (STS) device for type 1 complex regional pain syndrome in England: Lessons learnt.","authors":"Jessica Coggins, Sharon Grieve, Lisa Buckle, Darren Hart, Alison Llewellyn, Mark Palmer, Moniek Wittens, Candida McCabe","doi":"10.1177/20494637251371592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sensory discrimination training has demonstrated improvements in two-point discrimination and pain reduction in people with chronic pain. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a novel Sensory Training System (STS) device in the homes of people with Type 1 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants meeting CRPS diagnostic criteria were invited to use the STS for a minimum of 30 minutes per day for 30 days. Device usage data were captured by the STS. Assessments at baseline and after 30 days were: two-point discrimination ability, pain intensity and interference, sensitivity and emotions towards CRPS limb. Qualitative interviews were conducted at the end of the study to capture participants' feedback on the device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 participants (female n = 7) completed the study. Participants' mean age was 56.4 years (range: 24-78 years), and mean disease duration was 9.37 years (range: 4.25-26.5). Eight had lower limb CRPS. The mean STS device use was 27.3 ± 3.4 days and mean daily usage of training games was 00:27:11 ± 00:07:52 (hh:mm:ss). No patterns or trends were evident between device usage and outcome data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This feasibility study of a home-based STS for people with CRPS revealed key areas for improvement in the device's hardware and software and outlined the challenges of development and testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, while also capturing valuable usability insights from participant feedback. Key recommendations include early and ongoing collaboration with users, securing sufficient funding, ensuring correct device setup by participants, conducting interim analysis, and using online tools to enhance participant experience and data collection.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study was registered with ISRCTN registry on 28<sup>th</sup> May 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89099843).</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251371592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251371592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sensory discrimination training has demonstrated improvements in two-point discrimination and pain reduction in people with chronic pain. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a novel Sensory Training System (STS) device in the homes of people with Type 1 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

Methods: Participants meeting CRPS diagnostic criteria were invited to use the STS for a minimum of 30 minutes per day for 30 days. Device usage data were captured by the STS. Assessments at baseline and after 30 days were: two-point discrimination ability, pain intensity and interference, sensitivity and emotions towards CRPS limb. Qualitative interviews were conducted at the end of the study to capture participants' feedback on the device.

Results: A total of 10 participants (female n = 7) completed the study. Participants' mean age was 56.4 years (range: 24-78 years), and mean disease duration was 9.37 years (range: 4.25-26.5). Eight had lower limb CRPS. The mean STS device use was 27.3 ± 3.4 days and mean daily usage of training games was 00:27:11 ± 00:07:52 (hh:mm:ss). No patterns or trends were evident between device usage and outcome data.

Conclusion: This feasibility study of a home-based STS for people with CRPS revealed key areas for improvement in the device's hardware and software and outlined the challenges of development and testing during the COVID-19 pandemic, while also capturing valuable usability insights from participant feedback. Key recommendations include early and ongoing collaboration with users, securing sufficient funding, ensuring correct device setup by participants, conducting interim analysis, and using online tools to enhance participant experience and data collection.

Study registration: The study was registered with ISRCTN registry on 28th May 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89099843).

一种基于家庭的感觉训练系统(STS)装置治疗英国1型复杂区域性疼痛综合征的可行性研究:经验教训。
简介:感觉辨别训练已经证明改善两点辨别和疼痛减轻的人与慢性疼痛。我们测试了一种新型感觉训练系统(STS)装置在1型复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者家中的可行性和可接受性。方法:满足CRPS诊断标准的参与者被邀请使用STS,每天至少30分钟,持续30天。设备使用数据由化粪池系统收集。基线和30天后的评估包括:两点辨别能力、疼痛强度和干扰、对CRPS肢体的敏感性和情绪。在研究结束时进行了定性访谈,以获取参与者对该设备的反馈。结果:共有10名参与者(女性n = 7)完成了研究。参与者的平均年龄为56.4岁(范围:24-78岁),平均疾病持续时间为9.37年(范围:4.25-26.5)。8例下肢CRPS。STS设备的平均使用时间为27.3±3.4天,训练游戏的平均每日使用时间为00:27:11±00:07:52 (hh:mm:ss)。设备使用和结果数据之间没有明显的模式或趋势。结论:这项针对CRPS患者的家庭STS可行性研究揭示了该设备硬件和软件需要改进的关键领域,概述了COVID-19大流行期间开发和测试的挑战,同时也从参与者反馈中获得了宝贵的可用性见解。主要建议包括与用户进行早期和持续的合作,确保足够的资金,确保参与者正确设置设备,进行中期分析,以及使用在线工具来增强参与者体验和数据收集。研究注册:该研究于2021年5月28日在ISRCTN注册中心注册(https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89099843)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信