Risk stratification tool for pharmaceutical care in patients with cardiovascular disease.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anna de Dios Lopez, Esther Vicente Escrig, Paloma Sempere Serrano, Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
{"title":"Risk stratification tool for pharmaceutical care in patients with cardiovascular disease.","authors":"Anna de Dios Lopez, Esther Vicente Escrig, Paloma Sempere Serrano, Ramón Morillo-Verdugo","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a risk stratification tool for pharmaceutical care in patients with cardiovascular disease who require a comprehensive and personalized pharmaceutical approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The risk stratification model was collaboratively developed by hospital pharmacists specialized in managing cardiovascular risk patients, all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. Through three workshops and a pilot study, relevant variables were identified, grouped into four dimensions, and assigned relative weights. In the pilot study, data from patients in the participating centers were collected and analyzed to determine priority levels and assess the contribution of each variable. The Kaiser Permanente pyramidal model was adopted, classifying patients into three priority levels: priority 1 (intensive pharmaceutical care, 90th percentile), priority 2 (60-90th percentiles), and priority 3 (below the 60th percentile). Cut-off points were established based on this stratification, and each center recorded variables in an Excel sheet to calculate mean weighted scores per priority level and total risk scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed a questionnaire consisting of 20 variables grouped into four dimensions: demographic, socio-health and functional status, clinical and healthcare utilization, and treatment-related factors. Based on the tool application in a pretest study, the following cut-off points were established: 23 or more points for priority 1, 17-22 points for priority 2, and fewer than 16 points for priority 3. Over 80% of the total score was attributed to the dimensions of \"clinical and healthcare utilization\" and \"treatment-related factors\". Consequently, interventions based on the pharmaceutical care model were recommended for cardiovascular risk patients, tailored to their prioritization level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This stratification tool enables the identification of cardiovascular patients who require a higher level of pharmaceutical care, facilitating the adjustment of healthcare capacity. Validation of the model in a representative population is necessary to establish its broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2025.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a risk stratification tool for pharmaceutical care in patients with cardiovascular disease who require a comprehensive and personalized pharmaceutical approach.

Method: The risk stratification model was collaboratively developed by hospital pharmacists specialized in managing cardiovascular risk patients, all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. Through three workshops and a pilot study, relevant variables were identified, grouped into four dimensions, and assigned relative weights. In the pilot study, data from patients in the participating centers were collected and analyzed to determine priority levels and assess the contribution of each variable. The Kaiser Permanente pyramidal model was adopted, classifying patients into three priority levels: priority 1 (intensive pharmaceutical care, 90th percentile), priority 2 (60-90th percentiles), and priority 3 (below the 60th percentile). Cut-off points were established based on this stratification, and each center recorded variables in an Excel sheet to calculate mean weighted scores per priority level and total risk scores.

Results: Participants completed a questionnaire consisting of 20 variables grouped into four dimensions: demographic, socio-health and functional status, clinical and healthcare utilization, and treatment-related factors. Based on the tool application in a pretest study, the following cut-off points were established: 23 or more points for priority 1, 17-22 points for priority 2, and fewer than 16 points for priority 3. Over 80% of the total score was attributed to the dimensions of "clinical and healthcare utilization" and "treatment-related factors". Consequently, interventions based on the pharmaceutical care model were recommended for cardiovascular risk patients, tailored to their prioritization level.

Conclusion: This stratification tool enables the identification of cardiovascular patients who require a higher level of pharmaceutical care, facilitating the adjustment of healthcare capacity. Validation of the model in a representative population is necessary to establish its broader applicability.

心血管疾病患者药学服务的风险分层工具。
目的:为需要全面、个性化用药的心血管疾病患者提供药学服务的风险分层工具。方法:风险分层模型是由西班牙医院药学学会(Spanish Society of hospital Pharmacy)负责心血管风险患者管理的医院药师共同开发的。通过三次研讨会和一项试点研究,确定了相关变量,将其分为四个维度,并分配了相对权重。在试点研究中,收集和分析了参与中心患者的数据,以确定优先级别并评估每个变量的贡献。采用Kaiser Permanente金字塔模型,将患者分为三个优先级别:优先1(重症药学护理,第90百分位),优先2(60-90百分位)和优先3(低于第60百分位)。在此基础上建立分界点,每个中心将变量记录在Excel表格中,计算每个优先级的平均加权得分和总风险得分。结果:参与者完成了一份由20个变量组成的问卷,这些变量分为四个维度:人口统计、社会健康和功能状况、临床和医疗保健利用以及治疗相关因素。基于工具在预试研究中的应用,建立了以下分界点:优先级1为23分或更多,优先级2为17-22分,优先级3小于16分。“临床和医疗保健利用”和“治疗相关因素”的得分占总分的80%以上。因此,基于药物护理模式的干预措施被推荐给心血管风险患者,根据他们的优先级水平量身定制。结论:该分层工具能够识别出需要更高药学服务水平的心血管患者,便于调整卫生保健能力。有必要在代表性人群中验证该模型,以建立其更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信